rpms/lastfm/F-9 lastfm.spec,1.1,1.2

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 30.07.2008 18:09, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> Author: sergiopr
> 
> Update of /cvs/free/rpms/lastfm/F-9
> In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/cvs-serv19968
> 
> Modified Files:
> 	lastfm.spec 
> Log Message:
> * Wed Jul 23 2008 Sergio Pascual <sergio.pasra at gmail.com> 1.4.0.56102-3
 > [...]
> - Vendor changed to rpmfusion
> [...]
> 
> Index: lastfm.spec
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/free/rpms/lastfm/F-9/lastfm.spec,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> retrieving revision 1.2
> diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
> --- lastfm.spec	23 Jul 2008 06:22:11 -0000	1.1
> +++ lastfm.spec	30 Jul 2008 16:09:37 -0000	1.2
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>  
>  Name: lastfm
>  Version: 1.4.0.56102
> -Release: 2%{?dist}
> +Release: 3%{?dist}
>  Summary: Last.fm music client
> [...]
> -desktop-file-install --vendor="livna" \
> +desktop-file-install --vendor="rpmfusion" \

Do we want to do that (here and everywhere)? Quoting from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines

>     * If upstream uses <vendor_id>, leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as <vendor_id>.
>     * It is important that vendor_id stay constant for the life of a package. 
> 
> This is mostly for the sake of menu-editing (which bases off of .desktop file/path names). 


Opinions?

CU
knurd