using rpmfusion repo during fedora install

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 08.11.2008 05:01, David Timms wrote:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> On 07.11.2008 15:03, David Timms wrote:
>>> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> No idea. Note, I try to test the stuff right now as well, but for some 
>> stupid reason the installation in a KVM guest fails with the last 
>> package (the kernel) anaconda tries to install
> I think I saw someone say that devel/preview rpm and kernel were/are 
> getting installed twice, so that could be your issue ?
> Or were you trying with F9/8 ?

F-9 host, Preview in KVM.

>>>> But note, the better question would have been: Does out comps.xml 
>>>> have the right format? But I think it has, as it works just fine with 
>>>> stand-alone pirut (if one complies and runs the F8 version on rawhide)
>>> So I should continue to try and work out where the issue actually lies ?
>> I'd be glad, yeah. But note, I'll try to run some test myself as well; I 
>> plan to open a bug in bugzilla.redhat.com when I had a chance to look 
>> deeper into this.
>>
>> But note, we can't be really sure our comps files is correct. But I hope 
>> it is.
> I don't see any test scripts etc for comps.xml {other than xml tests}.
> OK, for 9:
> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/9/i386/repodata/804f17201293133c36a020ea786d00eb978300a2-comps.xml
 > [...]
> That seems to indicate that the group would include the "(RPM Fusion 
> Free)" text, and be different to the Fedora group, which contradicts 
> what you said earlier about the group being undifferentiated from Fedora.

That was a workaround that was used in F-8 and F-9 -- but the plan was 
to get rid of that workaround for rawhide and get the real soltuion in 
place, hence the comps.xml for rawhide looks quite different.

CU
knurd