Hosting the live cd

[Till Maas]

On Sun October 12 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

> And exactly that "I" in "went ahead with a name I picked" IMHO is
> totally unacceptable in a *community* project when it comes to important
> issues (like releasing and branding a new spin; just imagine what had
> happened if "I" (me in this context) would have simply imported all
> kmods from livna months ago without asking somebody else ahead of
> time!). If that is done to often then sooner or later we will be forced

> Parts of my mind think: Omega is well known by now so just use that.
>
> Other parts say: Why can't we simply use the name RPM Fusion together
> with the Free and Nonfree suffixes? That will make it obvious what this
> is about.

Was Omega promoted as the official RPMFusion spin anywhere? I cannot see 
anything that implies this in the announcement of fedora-annouce:

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-September/msg00015.html

Eearlier also Orange Sombrero was announced there:

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-September/msg00010.html

Afaik it is one important feature of Fedora to allow people to freely remix 
the contents and add stuff to create customs spins / live media. For Fedora 
the only Guideline is, that it must not called Fedora, if it does contains 
packages that are not from Fedora.

Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20081012/aed7e533/attachment.bin