[Bug 563] Review request: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst - AMD's proprietary driver for ATI graphic cards

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Sat Apr 25 01:17:16 CEST 2009


http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563





--- Comment #5 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart at gmail.com>  2009-04-25 01:17:16 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
...
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > 1* Does this file remains needed with 9.4? (should be set as %config at least)
> > %{_sysconfdir}/udev/makedev.d/40-catalyst-dri.nodes
> > (in other words, Is the module capable to create it own devices on
> > /dev/dri/card? )
> > the file need to be removed "then" the initrd regenerated in order to test for
> > this feature.
> Will test at home tonight.
What tell the testing ? 

> structure so we could create/destroy these files using r-c-d... I will try to
> continue working on this soon, and if it works then the need for files like 
udev creation and other power management files shoudn't be the priority for
now.

> > 7* deprecated Obsoletes/Provides from fglrx package history:
> > This doesn't have to be introduced in the new package (could be dropped in
> > fglrx also actually.)
...
> If we get rid of these, then FreshRPM users who install RPM Fusion will have no
> upgrade path... If we no longer wish to support this upgrade path on new
> branches (ie, F-11), I'm OK with that but I think that we need to keep it for
> F-9/F-10.
Wrong., only fglrx should have kept them, not catalyst. We could also assume
users have upgraded since now. Furthermore, according that F-11 users aren't
supposed to upgrade from F-9 (but from a step by F-10), we can even drop it
from F-11 fglrx package.


> > So to sum-up , I expect this package to be introduced in F-10/F-11 (F-9?).
> F-10 and F-11 right away (will migrate from old to new scheme eventually), and
> F-9 afterwards (but kept at the old scheme).
> 
> > Most of the above notes at pretty trivial to fix. (since that's just few tweaks
> > from a fglrx->catalyst rename) But I note this is for the old scheme. I really
> > think we need to work on the new scheme for both F-10/F-11.
> +1 - this is partially my fault, I don't have much time... I'm finishing the
> semester mid-may, at that point I'll have much more time to finish the last
> bits of r-c-d.
Okay, so we need to keep it the old way, and to convert eventually convert it
later (keeping Conflicts for now)

I'm still testing the new scheme on Rawhide with nvidia.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list