Precedence for shadowing a monolithic Fedora package?

[Michel Salim]

On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 10:31 -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> On Sunday 23 August 2009 10:22:10 am Michel Salim wrote:
> > The other concern is legality. I'm currently based in the US, so ... not
> > sure how much I can do this myself.
> 
> As are many rpmfusion packagers ;).
> 
True, that. I guess by the PGP precedence, since I only provide the
recipe for creating the package, and the build takes place on a server
overseas, it's kosher :P

OK, I created a review request for sonic-visualiser-freeworld here:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782

The corresponding Fedora package, that conflicts with this, will be
build when this one is approved. I plan to keep both in sync and build
updates concurrently.

Thanks,


-- 
Michel Salim
 <SalimMA at fedoraproject.org>
  GPG key ID: 78884778
  IRC:        hircus

Package Sponsor,
  Fedora Project
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20090823/b5f7b370/attachment.bin