[Bug 351] Review request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351





--- Comment #7 from David Timms <dtimms at iinet.net.au>  2009-02-01 06:31:52 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> 
> > I see no reason why it wouldn't work. 64bit requirements look like this:
> > libXt.so.6()(64bit)
> > while 32bit look simply like this:
> > libXt.so.6
OK, thanks Dominik,

While I am sure I tried this and it previously failed to work properly on
x86_64, I can confirm that it does operate correctly on x86_64 (F10). Since it
is a while ago now, perhaps the issue I saw was while the fedora buildsys was
trying to (scratch) build it that I saw a problem...

Updated:
Spec URL:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requirements.spec
SRPM URL:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requirements-1.0-4.fc10.src.rpm

- mod Requires (i386) packages from full path to just the filename
- add a readme document.
- use the %%{macro} style of macro
===
rpmlint -i:
vmware-requirements.i386: E: no-binary
The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain
any binaries.

vmware-requirements-server.i386: E: devel-dependency kernel-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.

4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.