[Bug 171] Review Request: rpmfusion-config-display - tool to manage proprietary graphic drivers

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Fri Jan 23 07:09:02 CET 2009


http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171


Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|2                           |3
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




--- Comment #30 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com>  2009-01-23 07:09:02 ---
Good work. I did most of the package review. Yet there's a little bit more work
to do. 
Note that this is not a software review or critique.

* Please make the description span the 80 columns. It'll look nicer.

* We don't need to package the INSTALL file.

* Please put the full text of GPLv2 into the COPYING file. The COPYING file, as
is, looks scary.

* Each package must consistently use macros. In most places %{name} is used. At
two places, you use "rpmfusion-config-display".

? Can we make a pixmap (icon) for this?

* Requires: pygtk2-libglade will pull python-2.5+ and pygtk2. So no need to add
Requires: pygtk2 and python >= 2.4

* Requires: pyxf86config >= 0.3.1
Do we need the version requirement for this? Even Fedora-7 comes with 0.3.33

* BuildRequires: automake, autoconf, python-devel >= 2.4
seem not necessary. Instead, you just need BR: python


What is left to review? I still have to check the scriptlets and stuff that
goes to /etc , initscript etc.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list