[Bug 396] Review request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396





--- Comment #46 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan at gmail.com>  2009-06-23 09:52:40 ---
(In reply to comment #45)
> I tried to find a more detailed explanation of both repo free|nonfree but could
> not find it in the wiki. It would be nice to have a page explaining what goes
> in free and what does not.

I just edited the Configuration and the Contributors pages to give more
emphasis to the following text (taken from
http://rpmfusion.org/AnnounceRepository):

"We have two separate software repositories:

    * "free" for Open Source Software (as defined by the Fedora Licensing
Guidelines) which the Fedora project cannot ship due to other reasons
    * "nonfree" for redistributable software that is not Open Source Software
(as defined by the Fedora Licensing Guidelines); this includes software with
publicly available source-code that has "no commercial use"-like restrictions"

Because paintdotnet is not wholly licensed under an Open Source License (as
defined by the Fedora Licensing Guidelines) it must go to nonfree.

HTH,

Andrea.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.