[Bug 616] Review request: thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Mon May 18 06:55:36 CEST 2009


http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616





--- Comment #4 from Remi Collet <Fedora at FamilleCollet.com>  2009-05-18 06:55:36 ---
Thanks for the comments

> AutoReq:  0

else enigmmail will require libxpcom.so and other .so  which are not provided
by thunderbird (to avoid mistake, because provided by xulrunner). All others
deps already required by thunderbird

All other .so already required by thunderbird.

> AutoProv: 0

No need to provide libenigmime-x86_64-gcc3.so
but this can probably be removed.

> LGPLv2+

The link point to the mozilla page which say LGPLv2+.
But as this is not a (re)usable lib. this have probably no sens.

> I guess you want the spec file to be as close as possible to the one from
thunderbird in Fedora,

Yes. Some patch are probably not usefull, but it's really simpler.

> Would we need to rebuild this package for each minor thunderbird update?

There is no real rule, for xulrunner the rule is 
- BR xunrunner-devel => requires xulrunner >= version
- BR xunrunner-devel-unstable => requires xulrunner = version (even if in fact
most app still works with a new "minor" release)
Here, it's really difficult to answer.

I think it "should work" (upstream don't release a new xpi for each minor
thunderbird version). I'm thinking of using the same solution then "lightning"
(a scriptlet to create a link in each TH/extensions dir).
And fedora ""never"" bring major update during a version lifecycle.

I will propose an update with such a scriplet

> the merge review is still open

I really think it will stay open for a long time...


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list