[Bug 639] New: Review request: gtkmm-utils-0.4.0 & gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0 - Library for use with paperbox.

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639

           Summary: Review request: gtkmm-utils-0.4.0 & gtkmm-utils-devel-
                    0.4.0 - Library for use with paperbox.
           Product: Package Reviews
           Version: Current
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: GNU/Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P5
         Component: Review Request
        AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review at rpmfusion.org
        ReportedBy: gareth.l.john at googlemail.com
                CC: rpmfusion-package-review at rpmfusion.org
            Blocks: 2,30
   Estimated Hours: 0.0


FILES:
http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils.spec
http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-fc10.src.rpm
http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-devel.spec
http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0-fc10.src.rpm

DESCRIPTION:
High level utility functions, classes and widgets written on top of gtkmm 
and glibmm. 
* logging framework 
* option parsing, date and string utilities 
* tile widgets (see a Paperbox screenshot) 
* dialog helpers 
The package consists of two shared libraries which will be installed 
to your pkg-config path, glibmm-utils and gtkmm-utils. Gtkmm is the 
official C++ API for GTK+, a graphical user interface toolkit used 
in the GNOME desktop. glibmm is a C++ API for GLib.

FEDORA?
Im not too sure if the package can be included in fedora repos, I am new to
this packaging thing as I usually compile myself i thought i should make an
effort to help, assumed that if it was capable of being in fedora repos it
would be.

RPMLINT SAYS:
$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-fc10.i386.rpm 
gtkmm-utils.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.0-FC10 ['0.4.0-fc10',
'0.4.0-fc10']
gtkmm-utils.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/libglibmm-utils.so.2.0.0
gtkmm-utils.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0
gtkmm-utils.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/libglibmm-utils.so
gtkmm-utils.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgtkmm-utils.so
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.

$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0-fc10.i386.rpm 
gtkmm-utils-devel.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.0-FC10
['0.4.0-fc10', '0.4.0-fc10']
gtkmm-utils-devel.i386: E: no-binary
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.

$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-fc10.src.rpm 
gtkmm-utils.src:18: W: hardcoded-packager-tag Gareth
gtkmm-utils.src:33: W: setup-not-quiet
gtkmm-utils.src:37: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build if [ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ];
then rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT; fi
gtkmm-utils.src:38: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
gtkmm-utils.src:39: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
gtkmm-utils.src:69: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0
gtkmm-utils.src:72: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0
gtkmm-utils.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 6)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings.

$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0-fc10.src.rpm 
gtkmm-utils-devel.src:18: W: hardcoded-packager-tag Gareth
gtkmm-utils-devel.src:33: W: setup-not-quiet
gtkmm-utils-devel.src:37: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build if [ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
]; then rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT; fi
gtkmm-utils-devel.src:38: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build mkdir -p
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
gtkmm-utils-devel.src:39: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
gtkmm-utils-devel.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab:
line 6)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.

This is my first package and first fusion package, also I am not a sponsored
packager!

I hope its not too shabby I have improved on as many errors as possible with
google and some knowledge and some guess work. I did not notice the white space
error but will fix that as for other errors some evade me and i cannot
understand the issue after searching such as "unstripped-binary-or-object" i
also left the apparent devel files as i had a feeling that they were sym links
and might have been needed for normal operation. Again this has produced errors
in the src.rpm which i have no idea about. Thanks!


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.