[Bug 459] Review request: cudatoolkit - NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459





--- Comment #11 from Milos Jakubicek <xjakub at fi.muni.cz>  2009-05-31 23:01:33 ---
Nicolas, thank you for your considerations very much:

(In reply to comment #10)
> I have improved the spec file, but it remains two ways of improvements with
> some related questions:
> - Does binaries/libraries compiled with cuda 1.1 works with cuda 2.1 (2.2)
> - Does the packaging scheme will work also for cuda 1.1 (which may remains
> suitable for older systems/drivers), and forthcoming 2.2 (in other words, shall
> we have version in the name, the same as java-1.6.0-{openjdk,sun} are
> versionned).

>From what I have found in forums, backward compatibility should be preserved,
hence I'd rather avoid such solutions.

> - How the cuda compiler should works with the nvidia drivers Requirements.
> (buildtime/runtime). That will make the cuda enabled libraries/(binaries?) to
> be enabled once the driver support cuda with an additional sub-directory (the
> same as glibc use dso from _libdir/sse2 when cpu support this feature). So
> either this sub-directory need to be versioned (sugegstion: _libdir/cudart-2.1)
> either we do not need that, (_libdir/cuda). 

Ehm...I'm afraid I probably didn't understand the question, but imo the
libraries should be just in %{_libdir}.

> 
> (I will submit a new spec soon).
> 

Could you submit the SPEC file so that we can move forward with this?


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.