[Bug 1165] Review request: cc65 - Crosscompiler/Crossassembler for 6502 systems

[RPM Fusion Bugzilla]

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1165


Dan Horák <dan at danny.cz> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dan at danny.cz




--- Comment #3 from Dan Horák <dan at danny.cz>  2010-04-17 17:23:36 ---
first do s/complaint/compliant/ :-)

I'm not actively working on it, I did the 2.12.0 a year ago and if I remember
correctly the update to 2.13.0 would need also to port the makefile patch.

The license - almost all files are licensed under zlib with only 2 files having
the original license that's considered non-free by Fedora (and thus it can't go
directly to Fedora). I think the details could be found either in
bugzilla.redhat.com or in the archives of fedora-legal mailing list. But the
Fedora packaging guidelines
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines) apply also to packages in
RPM Fusion.

The date of http://fedora.danny.cz/cc65-2.13.0.spec is the date of upload, I
last touched it half a year ago. It's meant primarily as an inspiration, but in
my opinion it could be acceptable for RPM Fusion.

The problems I see in the upstream spec file are
- the name/version %defines are redundant
- explicit usage of %attr
- using absolute paths instead of macros
- the target headers/libs should (IMHO) go into %{_datadir} (instead of
%{_libdir}) because the content is not arch dependent from the host's view
- the binaries are stripped and the -debuginfo subpackage is then useless


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.