renaming sdlmame to mame

[supercyper]

I agree with Andrea that the best way to do this is to make a new review request for mame. SDLmame can be safely Provides/Obsoletes by  mame.

See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1593895, p7zip was Provides/Obsoletes by xz-lzma-compat.

ÔÚ2010-01-17 17:45:24£¬"Julian Sikorski" <belegdol at gmail.com> дµÀ£º
>W dniu 17.01.2010 10:36, Andrea Musuruane pisze:
>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Julian Sikorski <belegdol at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> as of 0.136u1, sdlmame has been merged with the official version - i.e.
>>> the SDL osd is now part of the MAME source. Thus, I'd like to request a
>>> package rename. What's the correct procedure to do that? Is opening a
>>> bug blocking the CVS admin one enough?
>> 
>> I think the best way to do this is to make a new review request for
>> Mame that will obsolete sdlmame.
>> 
>> Bye,
>> 
>> Andrea.
>> 
>OK, the package overhaul could definitely use a review. As a related
>question: is any of you using the intermediate sdlmame releases from
>testing? These are going to be more painful to produce, it seems, so I'm
>wondering if it's worth the effort.
>
>Julian
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20100118/2e98940c/attachment.html