renaming sdlmame to mame

[Julian Sikorski]

W dniu 18.01.2010 13:38, supercyper pisze:
> I agree with Andrea that
> the best way to do this is to make a new review request for mame.
> SDLmame can be safely Provides/Obsoletes by  mame.
> 
> See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1593895, p7zip was
> Provides/Obsoletes by xz-lzma-compat.
> 
> ÔÚ2010-01-17 17:45:24£¬"Julian Sikorski" <belegdol at gmail.com> дµÀ£º
>>W dniu 17.01.2010 10:36, Andrea Musuruane pisze:
>>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Julian Sikorski <belegdol at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> as of 0.136u1, sdlmame has been merged with the official version - i.e.
>>>> the SDL osd is now part of the MAME source. Thus, I'd like to request a
>>>> package rename. What's the correct procedure to do that? Is opening a
>>>> bug blocking the CVS admin one enough?
>>> 
>>> I think the best way to do this is to make a new review request for
>>> Mame that will obsolete sdlmame.
>>> 
>>> Bye,
>>> 
>>> Andrea.
>>> 
>>OK, the package overhaul could definitely use a review. As a related
>>question: is any of you using the intermediate sdlmame releases from
>>testing? These are going to be more painful to produce, it seems, so I'm
>>wondering if it's worth the effort.
>>
>>Julian
>>
> 
> 
> 

0.137 is out, I'll upload the new package for review in the next couple
of days.

Julian