rpmfusion-release

Rahul Sundaram metherid at gmail.com
Sun May 16 14:45:52 CEST 2010


On 05/16/2010 06:08 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday, 15 May 2010 at 00:32, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> In RPMFusion, we have two repos - free and non-free and from a end user
>> perspective, they are very very likely to want both these repositories. 
>> Instead of having to install two separate release packages to get what
>> they want, can we generate a sub package, say rpmfusion-release-all that
>> covers both these repositories?
>>     
> Simpler: a metapackage that requires both -free and -nonfree.
>
>   

Wouldn't the user still be required to download and install two more
packages?  The idea of a single package with both the repositories is to
make things simpler. 

>> If we build such a release package within Livna, maybe we can enable all
>> three together.
>>     
> There's no Livna for recent Fedora releases. Which means there's no easy
> way for end-users to get libdvdcss in F-12, for example.
>   

Are there any active contributors who oppose adding libdvdcss to RPM
Fusion directly at this point?

Rahul


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list