[Bug 585] Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Sat Jun 4 06:34:31 CEST 2011


http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585





--- Comment #28 from Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info>  2011-06-04 06:34:30 ---
= Heads up for @rpmfusion-developers-list =

This package afaics aims the free repo these days; it's "AGPLv3 with
exceptions". Here is the exception (copy'n'pasted from index.php):

* According to sec. 7 of the GNU Affero General Public License, version 3,
* the terms of the AGPL are supplemented with the following terms:
*
* "Zarafa" is a registered trademark of Zarafa B.V.
* "Z-Push" is a registered trademark of Zarafa Deutschland GmbH
* The licensing of the Program under the AGPL does not imply a trademark
license.
* Therefore any rights, title and interest in our trademarks remain entirely
with us.
*
* However, if you propagate an unmodified version of the Program you are
* allowed to use the term "Z-Push" to indicate that you distribute the Program.
* Furthermore you may use our trademarks where it is necessary to indicate
* the intended purpose of a product or service provided you use it in
accordance
* with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters.
* If you want to propagate modified versions of the Program under the name
"Z-Push",
* you may only do so if you have a written permission by Zarafa Deutschland
GmbH
* (to acquire a permission please contact Zarafa at trademark at zarafa.com).

The file permission.pdf contains a written permission, that allows us to call
our package z-push. 

So IOW and roughly speaking: the situation is similar to Firefox in Fedora, but
not as strictly handled afaics. That's fine for me, but other RPM Fusion
developers should have a chance to raise concerns. Hence I'll wait until at
least Tuesday next week before I approve this package; of course we can always
rename the package later or move it to the nonfree repo if we want to.

= Review =

Ony a few minor things:

 * I for one find the spec file line
License:        AGPLv3 with exceptions
 confusing, as the "with exceptions" is not explained anywhere in an obvious
place. I'd say a clarifying comment or section in the README.FEDORA.package
would be a good idea. Normally I'd say you should bug upstream to add it to
LICENSE or create a file LICENSE.exception instead of adding it to files like
index.php only, as people might not see it there and think it's a regular
AGPLv3

 * BTW, I'd give files like README.FEDORA.package a prefix with %{name} in the
SRPM, as otherwise bad things bappen when people install multiple SRPMs that
contain files with that name

 * rpmlint gives a warning on the SRPM:
z-push.src:11: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 11, tab: line 3)

 * should zarafa-z-push have a dep on zarafa or something else that owns
/etc/zarafa/?

Comment on those and I'll approve it nobody complains about the naming.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list