libspotify in non-free?

[Jonathan Dieter]

On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 13:42 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/1/4 Jonathan Dieter <jdieter at lesbg.com>:
> > On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 22:55 +1100, David Timms wrote:
> >> On 04/01/12 22:31, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> >> > Does anyone object to putting libspotify into non-free?  I've put
> >> > together a package, but I'm not sure what their redistribution policy
> >> > is.  The main thing in their Terms of Use seems to be that it's for
> >> > non-commercial use, but I don't think that's a problem for non-free.
> >> For those of us not in the know: What is the URL to point to some info
> >> about the software ?
> >
> > Sorry, here it is:
> > http://developer.spotify.com/en/libspotify/overview/
> 
> Hello,
> 
> It might be redistributable but then for which usage ?
> Do you know a package that will use this library and at the same time,
> don't plan to embed the exact libspotify version they will use to
> instead, rely on a system library ?
> 
> Also, I'm not sure about what the application key is for ?

I'm looking at mopidy (http://www.mopidy.com) which is a MPD server that
uses Spotify as it's music source.  It doesn't come with libspotify
bundled, and I've put together packages for it, pyspotify, libspotify
and pykka.  AFAIC, whatever application key is needed is embedded in
mopidy.  FWIW, Mopidy, pyspotify and pykka are all licensed under ASL
2.0.

And, if it's not obvious in the reading, you do need a Spotify Premium
Account to use mopidy (or any application that uses libspotify).

Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20120104/5d74e756/attachment.bin