about mame

[Julian Sikorski]

W dniu 16.01.2012 14:48, Sérgio Basto pisze:
> Hi, so if I do :
> 
> yum list \*mame\*
> 
> Installed Packages
> gmameui.x86_64                0.2.10-1.fc12  @rpmfusion-nonfree                
> mame.x86_64                   0.144u5-1.fc16 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing
> mame-tools.x86_64             0.144u5-1.fc16 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing
> qmc2-sdlmame.x86_64           0.34-1.fc16    @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates        
> sdlmame-data.noarch           0144-1.fc16    @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing
> sdlmame-data-artwork.noarch   0120-3.fc11    @rpmfusion-nonfree                
> sdlmame-data-roms.noarch      0120-3.fc11    @rpmfusion-nonfree                
> Available Packages
> sdlmame.x86_64                0136-1.fc13    rpmfusion-nonfree                 
> sdlmame-data-samples.noarch   0139-1.fc14    rpmfusion-nonfree
> sdlmame-tools.x86_64          0136-1.fc13    rpmfusion-nonfree
> 
> First question : what mame-data should be installed ? 120 or 136/9 or
> all or none ? 
> Second sdlmame.x86_64 shouldn't be deleted ? since has been deprecated,
> IIRC, and others sdl-mame-data that are obsoleted ? . 
> 
> Thanks,
sdlmame is obsoleted by mame:
Provides:       sdlmame = 0%{baseversion}-%{release}
Obsoletes:      sdlmame < 0136-2
So I am not sure how you have managed to install both.
The sdlmame-data packages are pretty unrelated to each other, they
distribute content. I was considering retiring those but given that the
maintenance overhead is pretty low, they are still in the repos.

Julian