[Bug 1806] Review request: opera - A fast and secure web browser and Internet suite

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Mon Jul 23 14:03:57 CEST 2012


https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1806

--- Comment #16 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart at gmail.com> 2012-07-23 14:03:57 CEST ---
I don't remember what previously was the dependency issue, but something weird
seem still present:

--> Traitement de la dépendance : libX11.so.6 pour le paquet :
opera-12.00-2.fc16.x86_64
Whereas it should have be libX11.so.6()(64bit).

That's probably because a 32bit binary remains bundled within the package.
I guess this is related to:
/usr/lib64/opera/pluginwrapper/operapluginwrapper-ia32-linux



For Fedora EL in RPM Fusion. There are dedicated branches for each version of
Fedora or EL. So you will need to update each branches and take into account
the different version of RPM that will be used to build opera on each version.
(mostly related to the dependency filtering scheme specially, see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering )


One note about setting the RPM Vendor field. Fedora usually doesn't do that. A
Vendor field is usually set on the buildsys level and not on a package level. 
But that's also because this fied is to be understood as Distributor of the
package over been the Editor of the Software.
URL, Summary and description are fields dedicated to the Software Editor
instead.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list