ffmpeg-0.11

[Joseph D. Wagner]

On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:11:00 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:

> W dniu 12.06.2012 23:55, Julian Sikorski pisze:
>
>> W dniu 27.05.2012 12:46, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
>>
>>> 2012/5/27 Julian Sikorski :
>>>
>>>> Dear RPM Fusion developers, ffmpeg-0.11 was released a few days
>>>> ago. Do you think we should try to push it to Fedora 17?
>>> I'm not against having it as an update, but: - Is the ABI the same 
>>> ?
>>> - does dependants package build fin ? - Can we make the update to
>>> settle in rawhide first, and then to evaluate the update in F-17 
>>> (if
>>> relevant) ? I also wonder if it won't be more relevant to wait for 
>>> a
>>> new 0.10.x release that might be done at a later point. Nicolas
>>> (kwizart)
>> After finally getting CVS access back I was able to finish the
>> rebuild. Results are as follows: out of 34 dependencies, 5 worked 
>> out
>> of the box, one required libquicktime to be built first, one needed 
>> BR
>> fix and mplayer worked when updated to 1.1. I think we should still 
>> go
>> on and let the maintainers fix their packages. Details:
>> mplayer updated to 1.1 works, did not check otherwise 
>> picard-freeworld
>> requires vlc qmmp-plugins-freeworld failed vbam failed vlc failed:
>> free: command not found wxsvg worked xbmc failed
>> xine-lib-extras-freeworld failed xmms2-freeworld failed Regards, 
>> Julian
>
> To be clear: go on in rawhide and then see where we stand once
> everything is patched up.
>
> Julian

By saying mplayer 1.1 works, are you confirming there's a mplayer 
updating coming down the pipes?

Because I'd really appreciate one to fix some confirmed bugs, like this 
one:

Bug 2373 - Regression Prevents Subtitles from Being Turned Off
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2373

Upstream confirmed this as a bug that was fixed in svn r34996.

Joseph D. Wagner