text correction Re: Would unterminated processes cause RPMfusion build to fail?

Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux.com
Sat Mar 3 19:13:11 CET 2012


On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 10:24 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: 
> On 03/03/2012 12:32 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 17:08 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 20:27 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Miro fails its build during the check phase on Fedora 16:
> >>> 
> >>> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=12172
> >>> 
> >>> but succeeds when built locally on my mock instance. However,
> >>> it
> >> does
> >>> trigger some warnings:
> >> 
> >> + xvfb-run -a -w 1 ./test.sh RPM build errors:
> >> 
> >> The error seems in xvfb-run , this command  "xvfb-run -a -w 1
> >> ./test.sh"
> > 
> > is odd
> > 
> >> to run as a test (though).
> The tests involve importing some libraries that fail if DISPLAY is not
> set, thus the reason for using xvfb-run. The same tests run fine on my
> local mock set up.


But if it fail and we don't know why , we need logs of xvfb-run to know
whats happen , whats is odd ( for me of course) is this test when fail,
don't have logs about what happened. 


> And, to my original hypothesis, the failures are not due to the
> unterminated processes -- I applied a patch from the trunk sourcecode
> that fixes that issue, and RPM Fusion's mock still failed.
> 
> Disabling the tests for now (unless building with --with check, so I
> can still run the tests manually before submitting an official build)
> but this is really odd.

Let me know if builds after disable the tests.

Best regards,

-- 
Sérgio M. B.



More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list