qtractor moved to Fedora

Brendan Jones brendan.jones.it at gmail.com
Sun May 27 17:46:35 CEST 2012


On 05/24/2012 12:25 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/5/23 Brendan Jones<brendan.jones.it at gmail.com>:
>> On 05/21/2012 09:50 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 20 mai 2012 23:24, "Kevin Kofler"<kevin.kofler at chello.at
>>> <mailto:kevin.kofler at chello.at>>  a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>     Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>>      >  But in this case I wonder why not to simply override the no
>>>      >  replacement policy ? At least a good reason would need to be
>>> provided
>>>      >  for still obeying this policy.
>>>
>>>     Users in countries which obey software patents might not want their
>>>     patent-
>>>     compliant package silently replaced by a patent-encumbered one.
>>>
>>> It doens't hold, RPM Fusion free is fully made of patent encumbered
>>> components by design.
>>> Which make me wonder if we really need to requires the
>>> rpmfusion-free-release from the rpmfusion-nonfree-release from patent
>>> point of view.
>>>
>>> My point is that people using mp3 enabled qtractor from current RPM
>>> Fusion shouldn't received a disabled package either.
>>>
>>> Nicolas (kwizart)
>>
>>
>> I completely understand your concern here.
>>
>> Orcan has indicated that he was looking to find a new maintainer for
>> qtractor in any case. I'm more than happy to maintain both and personally
>> deal with the fallout. I think in Fedora renaming this anything other than
>> the 'qtractor' is unlikely. I'm happy to consider the alternatives option
>
> Ok so please at least consider submitting non-conflicting package.
> Have a look on OpenEXR_Viewer-nonfree for a sample about using alternatives.
>
> Nicolas (kwizart)

I'm thinking it might just be easier if we make it modular - upstream is 
more than happy as soon as I submit the patch. In the meantime I'm more 
than happy to leave the Fedora build in stasis, but will update the 
qtractor in RPMFusion 17 to build against the new LV2 stack if that's 
OK? (suil/lilv rather than slv2). Currently, I don't own anything in 
RPMFusion - is it OK that Orcan passes ownership to me being a Fedora 
maintainer or do I have to do something else?

Brendan


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list