[Bug 2565] Review-Request: spotify-client - streaming music player

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Tue Nov 13 15:20:16 CET 2012


https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2565

--- Comment #15 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec at gmail.com> 2012-11-13 15:20:16 CET ---

(In reply to comment #13)
[cut]
> The one area where I'm still not happy with it is that it's still not properly
> getting the requires for the symlinked libraries.
> 
> The following is a diff of requires for -2.fc17 versus my test package:
> $ diff -urb list1.s list2.s 
> --- list1.s    2012-11-13 15:16:03.556731030 +0200
> +++ list2.s    2012-11-13 15:16:08.359561375 +0200
> @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
>  /bin/sh
>  /bin/sh
> -/bin/sh
> -GConf2

The GConf requirement is not there in "your" version?

[cut]
> I still think it makes more sense to use automatically generated requires to
> get the information and possibly create a check that verifies that all library
> links in the binary ending in .0d or .1d have a symlink.  But if you really
> want to go down the explicit route, at the very least you need to require the
> 64-bit versions of the libraries when building for 64bit.
> 
> Also note that you can drop both the GConf2 and libpng12 requires as the
> libraries they provide are automatically being required already.

It would be easy to add (64bit) suffix as required. Still, isn't a dependency
like libpng12.so.0 always resolved to a 64-bit library on a 64-bit host? I have
no reference, but since it works...

(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #12)
[cut]
>  Thanks for your patience as we go back and forth on
> this. ;)

Same to you. Improving a package while learning some is not bad. :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list