No subject


Thu Feb 21 13:22:13 CET 2013


completely different soname than the latest ffmpeg at the date it was
introduced. So it was possible to install theses compat libraries along
with a modern ffmpeg (provided that no project was resolving symbol at
runtime, or using dependencies linked with both ffmpeg library version).

One other reason to choose 0.6 instead of 0.7 at that time was that many of
the improvements of 0.7 over 0.6 was related to make it easier for project
using ffmpeg to be compatible with more modern API. It was also related to
the split between FFmpeg/Libav because FFmpeg try to keep compatibility.
And just after the split, the early 0.7 branch was not as good as using
release before the split IMO.
Compatibility API is not something targeted for such compat package, as the
aim is to stay with a given API. So  the 0.6 version was picked instead.

So if it's easier to maintain 0.5, it can be downgraded to that version
instead and rebuild the dependencies.

Nicolas (kwizart)

--001a113330209f46ff04dd9cbcd8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2013=
/5/26 Julian Sikorski <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:belegdol at gmai=
l.com" target=3D"_blank">belegdol at gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote c=
lass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;=
padding-left:1ex">

Hi,<br>
<br>
I was wondering why are we shipping 0.6 as ffmpeg-compat and not 0.7.<br>


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list