FTBFS for F-19 free section

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qua, 2013-05-01 at 09:14 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: 
> Hi,
> 
> On 04/29/2013 03:36 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > 2013/4/29 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com <mailto:j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com>>
> >
> >     Hi,
> >
> >
> >     On 04/27/2013 04:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> >         ...
> >         sidplay-2.0.9-13.fc17.x86_64
> >
> >
> >     While working on sidplay, I found out there is a new upstream for it called sidplayfp,
> >     which fixes the issues making sidplay nonfree. So I've packaged libsidplayfp and
> >     sidplay for Fedora. Also the sid plugin for audacious has been changed to build with
> >     libsidplayfp and this has now landed in Fedora-updates for F-19+, so the following
> >     packages can now be retired from rpmfusion:
> >
> >     sidplay
> >     sidplay-libs
> >     audacious-plugins-nonfree
> >
> >     I'll go and create dead.package files for them in their F-19+ branches. What is
> >     the proper procedure for blocking these from inclusion in rpmfusion F-19+ repos ?
> >
> >
> > I will manually remove them from the repository.
> > taking care of that before the next push.
> >
> > BTW, what about an audacity update (in both fedora and RPM Fusion ?)
> > It looks unmaintained.
> 
> I've pinged the Fedora maintainer and he admits he was away for a while, but he is back now.
> 
> I've offered him help on getting the Fedora packages upgraded to 2.0.3, once that is done
> I'll also take care of the rpmfusion packages.

We already have a ticket to fix audacity :
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2707

see you there ;)
Thanks,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.