ffmpeg - here we go again

[Ken Dreyer]

If we push ffmpeg 2.1 before we branch, we would ship F20 with a
broken VLC, in that case?

I vote that we branch sooner than later, since Beta is scheduled to
ship in a month. Pushing back the branch date even further seems
risky.

- Ken

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Julian Sikorski <belegdol at gmail.com> wrote:
> W dniu 29.10.2013 21:11, Sérgio Basto pisze:
>> On Ter, 2013-10-29 at 20:21 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> ffmpeg-2.1 is out. preliminary rebuild shows 21 successes and 8 failures
>>> - and 4 of those are due to vlc's libfreerdp issues.
>>> I think we should branch first in any case:
>>>
>>> $ find -name success | sort
>>> ./audacious-plugins-freeworld-3.4.1-1.fc20/success
>>> ./chromaprint-tools-1.0-2.fc20/success
>>> ./dvbcut-0.6.1-14.svn179.fc20/success
>>> ./dvdstyler-2.6-0.1_rc2.fc20/success
>>> ./ffmpeg-2.1-1.fc20/success
>>> ./ffmpeg2theora-0.29-7.fc20/success
>>> ./gpac-0.5.0-7.20130914svn.fc20/success
>>> ./guvcview-1.6.1-6.fc20/success
>>> ./libquicktime-1.2.4-12.fc20/success
>>> ./lightspark-0.7.2-4.20130827git.fc20/success
>>> ./minidlna-1.1.0-2.fc20/success
>>> ./moc-2.5.0-0.10.beta1.fc20/success
>>> ./mpd-0.18-0.1.git0e0be02.fc20/success
>>> ./mplayer-1.1-14.20130811svn.fc20/success
>>> ./mpv-0.1.7-4.fc20/success
>>> ./openmw-0.26.0-6.fc20/success
>>> ./qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.7.2-2.fc20/success
>>> ./wxsvg-1.2.1-1.fc20/success
>>> ./x264-0.136-1.20131005git3361d59.fc20/success
>>> ./xbmc-13.0-0.1.Gotham_alpha8.fc20/success
>>> ./xine-lib-1.2.4-2.fc20/success
>>> $ find -name fail | sort
>>> ./acoustid-fingerprinter-0.6-5.fc20/fail
>>> ./bino-1.4.2-4.fc20/fail
>>> ./bombono-dvd-1.2.2-4.fc20/fail
>>> ./ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.8-6.fc20/fail
>>> ./ffmpegthumbs-4.11.1-1.fc20/fail
>>> ./kmediafactory-0.8.1-9.fc20/fail
>>> ./mlt-0.9.0-1.fc20/fail
>>> ./vlc-2.1.0-2.fc20/fail
>>
>> acoustid-fingerprinter
>> bino
>> bombono-dvd
>> ffmpegthumbnailer
>>
>> Already doesn't compile for ffmpeg-2.0, so IMHO you can submit it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
> There is still time needed to queue the rebuilds. I am happy to wait
> post-branch, but if others disagree I can submit it now.
>
> Best regards,
> Julian