Idea to improve rpmfusion installation UX

[Sérgio Basto]

On Seg, 2014-08-11 at 18:46 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote: 
> Hi.
> 
> 
> I just had this idea:
> 
> When a user wants to install rpmfusion, they need to download two
> files: free and nonfree.
> 
> What if you add a package called rpmfusion-free-and-nonfree-release
> which will contain both.
> 
> 
> Then, after install, it will be updated to an empty metapackage that
> will have a Require to both rpmfusion-free-release and
> rpmfusion-nonfree-release
> 
> 
> This reduces the number of steps a user has to take to install
> rpmfusion significantly, making the user experience much better. 

The thing is that we may only use rpmfusion-free.repo and install just
that one.

About installation references to [1] I think we could improve
installation to: 
first rpm --import
"http://rpmfusion.org/keys?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-20" 
and second 
yum install
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-$(rpm
-E %fedora).noarch.rpm

localinstall is not need it anymore


[1]
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/37820/confusion-with-rpm-fusions-signing-keys/ 
Best regards,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.