[Bug 3443] Review request: nemo-dropbox - Dropbox extension for nemo

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Mon Dec 15 02:08:43 CET 2014


https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3443

--- Comment #9 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt at gmail.com> 2014-12-15 02:08:43 CET ---
Actually, an idea to avoid a conflict, you could just package the conflicting
in a subpackage and make the main package depend on those files.

For example, if %{_bindir}/dropbox and %{_datadir}/applications/dropbox.desktop
are the conflict,

nemo-dropbox package:

Requires: %{_bindir}/dropbox

nemo-dropbox-extra:

Conflicts: nautilus-dropbox

Files:

%{_bindir}/dropbox
%{_datadir}/applications/dropbox.desktop


Just a thought, I'm not sure if there is any demand for using nemo and nautilus
on one machine, or if these extensions can even work coherently.
None the less, it seems silly to have a provides instead of a conflict, because
the are not equivalent packages, but conflicting ones.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list