Updating F-20 to ffmpeg-2.2.11

Julian Sikorski belegdol at gmail.com
Sun Dec 21 12:37:41 CET 2014


W dniu 05.11.2014 o 17:05, Sérgio Basto pisze:
> On Qua, 2014-11-05 at 07:33 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: 
>> W dniu 05.11.2014 o 03:55, Sérgio Basto pisze:
>>> On Dom, 2014-11-02 at 08:02 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: 
>>>> W dniu 15.10.2014 o 07:42, Julian Sikorski pisze:
>>>>> W dniu 15.10.2014 o 00:38, Sérgio Basto pisze:
>>>>>> Hi, 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Ter, 2014-10-07 at 08:02 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please be advised that 2.3 was recently removed from the maintained
>>>>>>> branches list:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2014-September/162904.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thus, if we ever rebase F-20, we should use 2.2 and not 2.3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The mode I like to work and to coordinate the mass rebuild for a stable
>>>>>> branch (F-20), is first be test in devel . We have packages in devel, we
>>>>>> test it for some time and when we can say that are stable , so we could
>>>>>> *copy* to F-20 , another point was: mass rebuild was for ffmpeg/x264 ,
>>>>>> not only ffmpeg .
>>>>>> So it is important have .specs for packages that compile in all Fedora
>>>>>> releases. Having 2 trees, one for F20, other for devel , is just
>>>>>> justified when is a very core package like udev or systemd  ... , but
>>>>>> for rpmfusion the point is other, maintainers are not aware ... 
>>>>>> So *theoretically* my solution was build ffmpeg 2.2 in devel, test it
>>>>>> and copy to F-20 , but devel already have 2.3 so is not practical . 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Moving forward, just update "ffmpeg" on F20 seems to me acceptable ,
>>>>>> like you wrote "only libavfilter has a soname bump (snip) This means
>>>>>> that we really only need to rebuild dvdstyler, mpv and xbmc." but we
>>>>>> miss the test phase, we need guarantee that ffmpeg version was tested ,
>>>>>> any suggestion ?
>>>>>
>>>>> ffmpeg-2.2 was in devel between March and August. Moreover, the reason
>>>>> why upstream picked it over 2.3 was that it is used by more downstream
>>>>> distros: OpenSUSE, SUSE Enterprise and ROSA [1]. If we let it sit in
>>>>> -testing for a bit longer than usual, I believe this will be enough.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Saying that and giving up mass rebuild ffmpeg/x264 for F-20, no need
>>>>>> preserve devel as is and we can do the mass rebuild for ffmpeg 2.4 on
>>>>>> devel , anything pending ?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think anything has changed since last time: dvbcut and
>>>>> kmediafactory fail to rebuild, vlc needs a patch, everything else builds
>>>>> fine. David Timms was working on making dvbcut work, but I have not
>>>>> heard from him regarding whether he was successful.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW what packages (.spec) do you have ? that are different from stable
>>>>>> branches to devel ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Only ffmpeg and mplayer. ffmpeg due to its numerous dependencies, and
>>>>> mplayer because it is highly dependent on ffmpeg.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks and best regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Downstreams
>>>>>
>>>> Where do we stand on this?
>>>
>>> I don't change must what I wrote :
>>> "Update ffmpeg on F20 seems to me acceptable ,like you wrote "only
>>> libavfilter has a soname bump ... This means that we really only need to
>>> rebuild dvdstyler, mpv and xbmc."
>>>
>>> I think you should decide and we need authorization from kwizart . 

Dear Nicolas,

do you agree to updating ffmpeg in F-20 to 2.2.11? 2.1 branch is pretty
much unmaintained upstream and using it is a security risk to our users.
A new release came out recently but it still was an exception to the rule.
The downstream effects are limited to dvdstyler, mpv and xbmc.

>>>
>>> you don't want rebuild others deps right ?  
>>>
>>>
>>> cheers 
>>>
>> I think we should go do it. 2.1 has not seen a release in months which
>> means there might be unfixed security issues in it.
>> I would only rebuild what we need to (dvdstyler, mpv and xbmc).
> 
> yes , we can use security police , we need update ffmpeg to 2.2.10 on
> Fedora 20 , due security concerns . 
> 
> kwizart, may we do this update ?, we need your authorization, I will
> rebuild dvdstyler, mpv and xbmc .  
> 
> I'm going test it meanwhile .
> 
> Thanks, 
> 

Dear Sergio,

when would it be convenient for you to do this?

Best regards,
Julian


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list