[Bug 3345] Review request: kodi - Media center

RPM Fusion Bugzilla noreply at rpmfusion.org
Sun Dec 28 22:37:15 CET 2014


https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3345

--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Dieter <jdieter at gmail.com> 2014-12-28 22:37:15 CET ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> The bundled libprojectM is forked from version 1.2. The version in Fedora is
> 2.0. There's a reason they call it "XBMCProjectM".

Ok, fair enough.

> The afpfs-ng, libcec, libdvdread, and zlib packages from Fedora are already
> being used.

That's great, but I think it would be good to actually remove them from the
generated source tree, if for no other reasons than to guarantee that they
aren't being built.

> Please note that licensecheck will list files that are conditionally compiled
> for Windows, OS X, or Android/ARM. The GPL is the main license that everything
> will fall under. Since some of the code is compiled into libraries
> (/usr/lib/kodi/system) I will include the licenses for them and the license
> files for eventclients.

Thank you.  This looks good now.

> In regards to arched-Requires: This package is not multi-lib.

Maybe not, but the libraries are multi-lib.  If, for some strange reason, I
have libcec.i686 installed, but not libcec.x86_64, installing kodi won't bring
in libcec.x86_64.  The manual requires need to have arched-Requires.

You could argue that
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
doesn't apply to kodi's devel packages because they're not multi-lib, but I'd
probably do it anyway, just to be safe.

Apart from all that, do you have thoughts on the man pages and the ExcludeArch?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list