Bundling exception for CMPlayer

Alec Leamas leamas.alec at gmail.com
Mon Jan 27 12:48:08 CET 2014


Here a t least two possibilities:
- You could build using the upstream sources. This an accepted way in
a situation like this if there is no library.
- You could cooperate with upstream and make them release a library.
Miro: are you listening?

--alec

On 1/25/14, Ben Reedy <thebenj88 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25/01/14 23:34, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> So 25. leden 2014, 14:05:08 CET, Alec Leamas napsal:
>>> That said, I
>>> don't really think it changes my overall conclusion that a try to push
>>> this upstream should be done.
>>
>> As a maintainer of mpv, I'd say the same thing.
>>
>> --
>> Miro Hrončok
>> --
>> Phone: +420777974800
>> IRC: mhroncok
> My concern is that even if these changes are successfully pushed
> upstream, CMPlayer will still not build without an included MPV source
> tree.
>
> Looking at the build-mpv script, MPV is first built and the resulting
> object files are placed in an ar archive at ./build/lib/
>
> libcmplayer_mpv.a, which is then used while building CMPlayer.
>
>
> The CMPlayer developer mentioned this earlier, stating that this is
> necessary as there is no libmpv shared library to link to while building.
>
>
> --Ben
>
>


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list