ffmpeg-2.4 released

[Julian Sikorski]

W dniu 25.09.2014 o 21:04, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> 2014-09-25 20:44 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto
> <sergio at serjux.com
> <mailto:sergio at serjux.com>>:
> 
>     On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 20:33 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>     > 2014-09-25 19:27 GMT+02:00 Julian Sikorski
>     <belegdol at gmail.com
>     <mailto:belegdol at gmail.com>>:
>     >         W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze:
>     >         > On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>     >         >> W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze:
>     >         >>> On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>     >         >>>> Dear all,
>     >         >>>>
>     >         >>>> ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have
>     >         another rebuild
>     >         >>>> coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have
>     >         failed, which is
>     >         >>>> not bad given the extent of API changes:
>     >         >>>> - alsa-plugins-freeworld: pcm_a52.c:101:45: error:
>     >         'struct a52_ctx' has
>     >         >>>> no member named 'frame'
>     >         >>>> - dvbcut: lavfmuxer.cpp:63:57: error: 'av_new_stream' was
>     >         not declared
>     >         >>>> in this scope
>     >         >>>> - kmediafactory: videofile.cpp:74:45: error:
>     >         'av_find_stream_info' was
>     >         >>>> not declared in this scope (mencoder needs to be rebuilt
>     >         first)
>     >         >>>>  - vlc: configure: error: libavcodec versions 56 and
>     >         later are not
>     >         >>>> supported yet.
>     >         >>>>
>     >         >>>> Given that we are close to branching (?), what would be
>     >         the good time to
>     >         >>>> do the rebuild?
>     >         >>>
>     >         >>> yes, I don't see any problem, I can do the mass rebuild of
>     >         others
>     >         >>> packages, no problem.
>     >         >>>
>     >         >>> My question if we ever put this updates on F20 ? I'd like
>     >         put it at
>     >         >>> least on update-testing. I can made a list of the
>     >         packages, with
>     >         >>> ffmpeg / x264 dependencies, that should stay on
>     >         update-testing for more
>     >         >>> time than usual, but is not my decision .
>     >         >>>
>     >         >>>
>     >         >>> Best regards,
>     >         >>>
>     >         >> ffmpeg-2.4.1 has now been built. I will take care of
>     >         rebuilding mplayer.
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > Can we care about rebuilding all dependencies at the same time ?
>     >
>     yes of course , I will take care ,
> 
>     but may I build all for new ffmpeg /x624 for F20 ?
> 
> 
> SO I NAK the ffmpeg update in F-20 because the way the update was done
> in Rawhide.
> I don't want to hear about it. This is not acceptable not to have
> coordinated the update.
> PERIOD.
> 
> 
> -- 
> -
> 
> Nicolas (kwizart)

In case this gets reconsidered at some point in the future: I have done
a test rebuild of F-20 dependecies against ffmpeg-2.3.4, and all 37 have
built correctly.
Moreover, only libavfilter has a soname bump (please find rpmsodiff
output attached). This means that we really only need to rebuild
dvdstyler, mpv and xbmc.

Best regards,
Julian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ffmpeg-sodiff.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 12989 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20141004/fc3c4124/attachment.bin>