rpms/moc/F-20 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 moc.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.5, 1.6

Nicolas Chauvet kwizart at gmail.com
Tue Sep 2 20:34:39 CEST 2014


2014-09-02 19:49 GMT+02:00 Antonio Trande <anto.trande at gmail.com>:

> On Tue 02 Sep 2014 07:43:13 PM CEST, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > On 09/02/2014 12:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On 09/02/2014 06:11 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >>> On 08/31/2014 04:02 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> >>>>
> >>>> On 08/30/2014 03:43 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> >>>>> 2014-08-30 15:20 GMT+02:00 Antonio <sagitter at rpmfusion.org
> >>>>> <mailto:sagitter at rpmfusion.org>>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Author: sagitter
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Update of /cvs/free/rpms/moc/F-20 In directory
> >>>>> old02.ovh.rpmfusion.lan:/tmp/cvs-serv12275/F-20
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Modified Files: .cvsignore moc.spec sources Log Message: Update
> >>>>> to new stable release 2.5.0 .
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ..
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ## Source archive from svn #2641; obtained by: ## svn co
> >>>>> svn://daper.net/moc/trunk <http://daper.net/moc/trunk> -## tar
> >>>>> -czvf  moc-2.5.0-14.beta2.tar.gz trunk -Source0:
> >>>>> %{name}-%{version}-14.beta2.tar.gz +## tar -czvf
> >>>>> moc-2.5.0-17.beta2.tar.gz trunk +## Source0:
> >>>>> %%{name}-%%{version}-17.beta2.tar.gz + +Source0:
> >>>>> http://ftp.daper.net/pub/soft/moc/stable/moc-2.5.0.tar.bz2
> >>>>>
> >>>>> version macro.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +%ifnarch armv6hl armv7hl +BuildRequires: ffmpeg-devel
> >>>>> +BuildRequires: libmad-devel +%endif
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> At least you can use %{arm} architectural macro, but can you
> >>>>> explain why it would not be enabled on ARM ? At least it does
> >>>>> build perfecly fine until now.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> They're related to RPMs built outside RPMFusion, but for Pidora.
> >>>
> >>> Pidora supports armv7hl these days?
> >>
> >> No.
> >
> > OK, then just do:
> >
> > %ifnarch armv6hl
> >
> > and leave out the armv7hl bit that affects fedora.
> >
>
> I prefer to keep a distinct SPEC for Pidora in order to avoid other
> mistakes in future.
> Thanks for your tip.
>

Yes, It's even technically possible for ffmpeg to be built for pidora, so
it could be harder to build rpmfusion for pidora which tweaks like this.
As I reminder, I'm automatically rebuilding RPM Fusion packages for armv7hl
right now:
http://rpmfusion.org/Architectures/ARM

Nicolas (kwizart)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20140902/bbf9ce06/attachment.html>


More information about the rpmfusion-developers mailing list