Bug triage for f23

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2015-11-19 12:59 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> On 15-11-15 08:12, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
>> On Sáb, 2015-11-14 at 16:34 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm still trying to focus on rfpkg/distgit infra tasks. But there are
>>> others tasks that can be worked on.
>>> Many packages are not recent enought for f23 and might fail at
>>> runtime for any reason.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry something went wrong in previous emails, the final list is:
>> rpmfusion-free bombono-dvd
>> rpmfusion-free get-flash-videos
>> rpmfusion-free libopenshot
>> rpmfusion-free mixxx
>> rpmfusion-free nailer
>> rpmfusion-free oxine
>> rpmfusion-free python-libopenshot
>> rpmfusion-free qmmp-plugins-freeworld
>> rpmfusion-free smc
>>
>
> smc just needs a rebuild against the F-23 buildroot
> for the new boost found there. I've tested this locally,
> just rebuilding the current f22 spec should be enough
> (it will get a new dist-tag to make it newer).
>
> rpmfusion-free smc-music
>>
>
> This one just needs smc to be fixed.
>
> rpmfusion-free sox-plugins-freeworld
>> rpmfusion-free xpra-codecs-freeworld
>> rpmfusion-free z-push-zarafa
>> rpmfusion-nonfree frogatto
>>
>
> frogatto just needs a rebuild against the F-23 buildroot
> for the new boost found there. I've tested this locally,
> just rebuilding the current f22 spec should be enough
> (it will get a new dist-tag to make it newer).
>
> rpmfusion-nonfree gmameui
>> rpmfusion-nonfree pdflib-lite-perl
>> rpmfusion-nonfree pipelight
>> rpmfusion-nonfree pipelight-common
>>
>
> The problem with pipelight is that it depends on
> pipelight-selinux which was imported into Fedora,
> but then later dropped as the rest of pipelight
> ended up in rpmfusion. We should add a new
> pipelight-selinux package to rpmfusion-nonfree
> and import the latest src.rpm from:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=545078
>
> To fix this, feel free to make me the maintainer
> of pipelight-selinux (I'm a pipelight user).
>

I don't get in which direction the wind blows currently WRT selinux policy
packaging, but can't we have the pipelight-selinux merged back into
pipelight package ? (keeping the -selinux package might be optional since
obviously we are using selinux by default and even this package requires
-selinux by default).

Others rebuilt are progressing, are will be pushed in few hours.
Thx



-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/attachments/20151121/663254fd/attachment.html>