<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.16.1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
I understood that z00dax of centos.karan.org was in RPM repo.<BR>
Funny thing is i'm hosting centos.karan.org just on the same server as rpm.livna.org and upcoming rpmfusion repo :)<BR>
<BR>
He's a good m8, if you want i can ask him to join/talk with us ?<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Le jeudi 29 novembre 2007 à 11:40 -0700, Richi Plana a écrit :
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 19:18 +0100, Andrea Musuruane wrote:</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> 2007/11/29, Richi Plana <<A HREF="mailto:myfedora@richip.dhs.org">myfedora@richip.dhs.org</A>>:</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> > Is there any work between RPMFusion and RPMRepo</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> > (<A HREF="http://www.rpmrepo.org/">http://www.rpmrepo.org/</A>) in making sure that the packages they release</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> > work well together? Or, at the very least, packages from one don't</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> > conflict with the other (AND Fedora)? Perhaps while both attempts are at</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> > their infancy, steps could be made so that the possibility of collusion</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> > down the line won't be made impossible.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> Some of the packager of RPM Repo were asked to join RPM Fusion but</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> they had different plans.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Sometimes it's impossible (or at least improbable) for projects to join.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">The reasons vary including personal pride, differences in opinion or</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">philosophy, technical or even logistical reasons. That said ...</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> Since this question comes to this list frequently, I wonder if we</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> should say something somewhere in the wiki.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">It would be great for the end-user if they/we could be made aware of</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">where two major players like RPMRepo and RPMFusion differ as well as</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">where they follow the similar rules. End-users must decide how to treat</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">both parties, and in most cases will opt to choose both. It would help</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">the end-user decide which package to use from which repo given that</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">he/she is aware of the differences in the options.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">In that sense, yes, a wiki documenting these "different plans" would be</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">a good idea. Who knows? Perhaps the two might not be so different after</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">all.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">--</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Richi Plana</FONT>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>