<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2008/5/5 KH KH <<a href="mailto:kwizart@gmail.com">kwizart@gmail.com</a>>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">2008/5/5 Hans de Goede <<a href="mailto:j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl">j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl</a>>:<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">> Xavier Lamien wrote:<br>
><br>
> > 2008/5/4 Ian Chapman <<a href="mailto:packages@amiga-hardware.com">packages@amiga-hardware.com</a>>:<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > > Hi All,<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Just a quick note to those who it concerns that Dribble is now frozen<br>
> and<br>
> > > no new updates or packages will be permitted there. Most contributors<br>
> are<br>
> > > migrating their packages to RPM Fusion, including most of mine. Thanks<br>
> very<br>
> > > much and I wish RPM Fusion the best of luck.<br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> ><br>
> > Thanks a lot Ian,<br>
> ><br>
> > I think dribble will be the first to merge in next couple of days, as we<br>
> > have a clean frozen version of packages set.<br>
> ><br>
> > Hans give a signal for cvssync.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
><br>
> Xavier,<br>
><br>
> We (Dribble) don't have a CVS, given the low package count and churn we've<br>
> always been passing Ian srpms to build.<br>
><br>
> So in order to get dribble's packages into rpmfusion cvs / look a side,<br>
> someone would need to go to:<br>
> <a href="http://dribble.org.uk/listrpms4.html" target="_blank">http://dribble.org.uk/listrpms4.html</a><br>
><br>
> Create cvs modules for all srpms listed there and then use cvs-import on<br>
> the srpms linked from there to populate the cvs modules.<br>
><br>
> Owners for the modules can be found here:<br>
> <a href="http://rpmfusion.org/InitialPackageMerge" target="_blank">http://rpmfusion.org/InitialPackageMerge</a><br>
><br>
> But I guess all owners first need to have a FAS account, so maybe now would<br>
> be a good moment to send a mail to the list asking everyone to create a FAS<br>
> account?<br>
><br>
> Hmm, I just realized that creating cvs modules isn't that easy because we<br>
> first need to decide on a package for package base wether it goes to<br>
> non-free or free.<br>
><br>
> So what are the rules for free? I would like to suggest the following:<br>
><br>
> "free: anything of which all components are under a license which is listed<br>
> as<br>
> good on: <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing" target="_blank">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing</a><br>
><br>
> Notice that free fully follows this webpage except that chapter 6<br>
> "Software<br>
> Types" is ignored.<br>
><br>
> Notice that anything depending upon anything in non-free must be in<br>
> non-free<br>
> itself."<br>
><br>
> Can everyone live with this? If we can agree this is the rule for the<br>
> non-free free split, then I can make a list of which packages in dribble<br>
> should go where.<br>
<br>
</div></div>Hi !<br>
I agree from this. I just want to notice that "-nonfree" expects at<br>
least the package to be redistributable.<br>
I don't expect dribble have such packages. But amr{nb,wb} codecs are<br>
( altought opensource - we even cannot retristribute the sources).<br>
For such cases i guess it would be desirable to have nosrc.rpm in the<br>
SRPMS non-free section.<br>
<a href="http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/nosrc/amrnb-7.0.0.0-1.nosrc.rpm" target="_blank">http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/nosrc/amrnb-7.0.0.0-1.nosrc.rpm</a><br>
<a href="http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/nosrc/amrwb-7.0.0.2-1.nosrc.rpm" target="_blank">http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/nosrc/amrwb-7.0.0.2-1.nosrc.rpm</a><br>
I will request a review if allowed.<br>
<br>
Also all packages that can go to Fedora shouldn't be allowed in RPM Fusion.<br>
( I have submitted some perl package freshrpms use for dvdrip at least)<br>
<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444733" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444733</a><br>
<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444744" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444744</a><br>
<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444745" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444745</a><br>
<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444755" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444755</a><br>
I don't know if this can concern some p2p programs that are<br>
problematic in some country...</blockquote><div><br><br>It could, so you should take this in account first.<br><br><br></div></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Xavier.t Lamien<br>--<br><a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien</a><br>
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB<br>Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB