<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P>I agree with Andrea that the best way to do this is to make a new review request for mame. SDLmame can be safely Provides/Obsoletes by mame.</P>
<P>See <A href="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1593895">http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1593895</A>, p7zip was Provides/Obsoletes by xz-lzma-compat.</P>
<P>ÔÚ2010-01-17 17:45:24£¬"Julian Sikorski" <belegdol@gmail.com> дµÀ£º<BR>>W dniu 17.01.2010 10:36, Andrea Musuruane pisze:<BR>>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Julian Sikorski <belegdol@gmail.com> wrote:<BR>>>> Hi,<BR>>>><BR>>>> as of 0.136u1, sdlmame has been merged with the official version - i.e.<BR>>>> the SDL osd is now part of the MAME source. Thus, I'd like to request a<BR>>>> package rename. What's the correct procedure to do that? Is opening a<BR>>>> bug blocking the CVS admin one enough?<BR>>> <BR>>> I think the best way to do this is to make a new review request for<BR>>> Mame that will obsolete sdlmame.<BR>>> <BR>>> Bye,<BR>>> <BR>>> Andrea.<BR>>> <BR>>OK, the package overhaul could definitely use a review. As a related<BR>>question: is any of you using the intermediate sdlmame releases from<BR>>testing? These are going to be more painful to produce, it seems, so I'm<BR>>wondering if it's worth the effort.<BR>><BR>>Julian<BR>><BR></P><br><br><span title="neteasefooter"/></span>