<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/2/23 David Timms <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dtimms@iinet.net.au">dtimms@iinet.net.au</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On 24/02/10 07:27, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<a href="http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030" target="_blank">http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030</a><br>
<br>
--- Comment #100 from Alex Lancaster<<a href="mailto:alexl@users.sourceforge.net" target="_blank">alexl@users.sourceforge.net</a>> 2010-02-23 21:27:38 ---<br>
(In reply to comment #99)<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Ok, I'm willing to review this, but so far the only packages I've reviewed for<br>
Fedora have been softballs and this looks like it will be pretty massive.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Excellent! I'm sure others will also step in to help out. Also there's been<br>
a fair amount of "reviewing" already especially by Ralf (see the previous<br>
almost 100 comments!) so the package has already been through the ringer<br>
already and some of the trickier issues have already been addressed.<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Is -12 current?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yep: -12 is the most recent.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Hi, I would like to suggest that this package review (which has really been more of a packaging development bug) be closed, and a new one requested. (close duplicate after create new bug)<br>
<br>
This would keep the normal review stuff together, and uncluttered by the preliminary package development work.<br>
<br>
Anyone else agree/disagree ?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br><font color="#888888">
David Timms.<br>
</font></blockquote></div>I don't see any problem with keeping the same bug report for the review, <br>That development side was fully part of the review process.<br>I don't see any reason to split, specially as this review seems exemplary of what work need to be achieved if a package doesn't comply with our guidelines.<br>
<br>Once that said, I guess a sum-up of what remain to be worked on, would be welcome for a new comer. <br><br>Nicolas (kwizart)<br><br>