<DIV>On 2010-04-27&nbsp;16:31:10，"Nicolas&nbsp;Chauvet"&nbsp;&lt;<A href="mailto:kwizart@gmail.com">kwizart@gmail.com</A>&gt;&nbsp;Wrote ：<BR>&gt;To&nbsp;have&nbsp;FFmpeg&nbsp;in&nbsp;Fedora,&nbsp;I&nbsp;would&nbsp;just&nbsp;built&nbsp;the&nbsp;library&nbsp;from&nbsp;stripped<BR>&gt;source&nbsp;with&nbsp;a&nbsp;special&nbsp;suffix&nbsp;SONAME&nbsp;and&nbsp;using&nbsp;alternatives&nbsp;with&nbsp;a&nbsp;low<BR>&gt;number&nbsp;for&nbsp;the&nbsp;pc&nbsp;files.&nbsp;Then&nbsp;with&nbsp;the&nbsp;same&nbsp;revision&nbsp;of&nbsp;the&nbsp;unstripped<BR>&gt;sources,&nbsp;the&nbsp;standard&nbsp;version&nbsp;only&nbsp;with&nbsp;libavcodec.&nbsp;(along&nbsp;with&nbsp;a<BR>&gt;tweaked&nbsp;library&nbsp;using&nbsp;the&nbsp;same&nbsp;SONAME).&nbsp;That&nbsp;way,&nbsp;codec&nbsp;that&nbsp;was&nbsp;not<BR>&gt;available&nbsp;in&nbsp;the&nbsp;package&nbsp;built&nbsp;with&nbsp;the&nbsp;fedora&nbsp;FFmpeg&nbsp;version&nbsp;will<BR>&gt;become&nbsp;available.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;Nicolas&nbsp;(kwizart)<BR>Debian&nbsp;ffmpeg maintainers simply disabled some codecs in %configure instead of strip the source code as before. </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><A href="http://supercyper.fedorapeople.org/ffmpeg/debian/README.Source">http://supercyper.fedorapeople.org/ffmpeg/debian/README.Source</A></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>But FE-legal seems much more strict than debian-legal, I wonder whether we can do it in the same way. Another thing need to consider is how&nbsp;many codecs could be&nbsp;approved by FE-legal, can we ship as many codecs as debian counterpart?</DIV>
<DIV><A href="http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/ffmpeg">http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/ffmpeg</A></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Regard,</DIV>
<DIV>Chen Lei</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Chen Lei</DIV><BR><BR><SPAN title="neteasefooter">
<HR>
<A href="http://ym.163.com/?from=od3" target="_blank">网易为中小企业免费提供企业邮箱（自主域名）</A> </SPAN><br><br><span title="neteasefooter"/><hr/>
<a href="http://ym.163.com/?from=od3" target="_blank">网易为中小企业免费提供企业邮箱（自主域名）</a>
</span>