I was able to generate a full set of binary and source packages for both omnibook and omnibook-kmod. I should point out that the actual change to the existing package is tiny, almost trivial, and was only needed to compensate for a change in linker behavior. If the old package was acceptable, the new should be as well.<div>
<br></div><div>I suspect everyone's busy with F15-related things just now, so I should mention that the akmod worked fine on my Toshiba laptop after my preupgrade to F15. Hope someone can get to the review soon!</div>
<div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div>Ryan<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Ryan Martin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kynalvarus@gmail.com">kynalvarus@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><p>Sorry about the pause, life got busy on me. I've submitted the omnibook-kmod SRPM for review.</p>
<p>Best, Ryan</p><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<div class="gmail_quote">On May 25, 2011 8:33 AM, "Dominik &apos;Rathann&apos; Mierzejewski" <<a href="mailto:dominik@greysector.net" target="_blank">dominik@greysector.net</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution">
> Hi Ryan,<br>
> welcome on board.<br>> <br>> On Sunday, 22 May 2011 at 18:39, Ryan Martin wrote:<br>> [...]<br>>> Recently, I was able to fix a bug in the Omnibook support package, a<br>>> somewhat abandoned set of drivers for certain laptop-specific<br>
>> functions of many HP and Toshiba laptops.<br>>> (<a href="http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3157406&group_id=174260&atid=868544" target="_blank">http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3157406&group_id=174260&atid=868544</a>)<br>
> <br>> While I can't say if your fix is proper, your work is definitely<br>> welcome. I don't have as much time as I used to to work on my packages,<br>> so someone with the same hardware would be appreciated.<br>
> <br>> <br>>> I've been going through the process of joining RPM Fusion in order to<br>>> update these packages, but I've hit a bit of a deadlock. According to<br>>> the contributors page, in order to get sponsored and get CVS access to<br>
>> RPM Fusion, I'm supposed to submit a package for review.<br>> <br>> Becoming a packager without creating a new package is not without<br>> precedent and I could sponsor you. However, I'd like you to do a couple<br>
> of package reviews (non-binding, obviously), to evaluate your grasp<br>> of packaging guidelines and best practices. The package reviews can be<br>> done either in Fedora or RPMFusion.<br>> <br>>> However,<br>
>> rather than reinvent the akmod and kmod spec file from scratch, I'd<br>>> like to update the exising ones. It seems that without getting<br>>> sponsored, I cannot get the ssh access to <a href="http://cvs.rpmfusion.org" target="_blank">cvs.rpmfusion.org</a> that would<br>
>> allow me to check out and review the work that's already been done.<br>> <br>> You can get the src.rpm and see the specfile inside. Please send any<br>> patches my way and I'll apply them.<br>> <br>
> Regards,<br>> Dominik<br>> -- <br>> Fedora <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann" target="_blank">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann</a><br>> RPMFusion <a href="http://rpmfusion.org" target="_blank">http://rpmfusion.org</a> | MPlayer <a href="http://mplayerhq.hu" target="_blank">http://mplayerhq.hu</a><br>
> "Faith manages."<br>> -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"<br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>