<p>2011/12/11 Xavier Bachelot <<a href="mailto:xavier@bachelot.org">xavier@bachelot.org</a>>:<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> libbluray has made its first official release a few days ago. The soname was<br>
> bumped to 1.0.0 just before the release, in order to make sure it's<br>
> incompatible with older snapshots they have produced. The snapshots I've<br>
> made and packaged for Fedora are compatible with the release, so Fedora/RPM<br>
> Fusion packages should be fine after a simple rebuild.<br>
><br>
> I would like to have a clean start with this library and have the updated<br>
> package pushed to devel, but also to all currently active releases ( F-16,<br>
> F-15 and EL-6), despite the soname breakage. Now that upstream is ready to<br>
> push releases, I think it will be easier to keep the package in good shape<br>
> if we follow them.<br>
><br>
> Affected packages are as follow :<br>
><br>
> For F17 and F16 :<br>
> gvfs (fedora)<br>
> mplayer (rpmfusion-free)<br>
> xbmc (rpmfusion-free)<br>
><br>
> For F15 :<br>
> mplayer (rpmfusion-free)<br>
> xbmc (rpmfusion-free)<br>
><br>
> EL-6 doesn't have any affected package.</p>
<p>Hello Xavier,</p>
<p>Vlc has gained support for libbluray with Rawhide/F-17 so I'm fine with having it updated ASAP.<br>
But I expect that can wait for the new snapshot.</p>
<p>For older Fedora releases I'm more doubtful, is there really new features introduced? <br>
Can't we consider bluray users in need for a new version to move to f16?</p>
<p>Nicolas (kwizart)<br>
</p>