[Fwd: Re: Legality questions.... (<repositoryWhichShallNotBeNamed> & nVidia)]

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

Just one note:

On 20.09.2008 08:14, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> -------- Přeposlaná zpráva --------
>> Předmět: Re: Legality questions.... (<domanWhichShallNotBeNamed> &
>> nVidia)
>> Datum: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:26:28 +0530
>>  
>> Matěj Cepl wrote:
>>> Rahul Sundaram píše v So 30. 08. 2008 v 07:53 +0530:
>>>>> Alexander Oliva suggested to split <domanWhichShallNotBeNamed>
>> into two independent
>>>>> repositories -- one (using Debian terminology) non-free and other
>> non-us
>>>>> I don't know if anything came out of this idea. Although, I am
>> afraid,
>>>>> even European Red Hat employess wouldn't be allowed to talk about
>> non-us
>>>>> repository.
>>>> Rpmfusion.org is doing just that per my suggestion. 

Note sure who exactly said that (and I don't care at all), but just to 
put things straight: the idea for the split is way older than RPM Fusion 
(¹); the idea also was raised by a lot of different people in private 
and in public; and it was one of the things that was on the initial 
agenda and agreed on during the first discussions for RPM Fusion -- way 
before it was mentioned in public. So nobody on this world can really 
say "Rpmfusion.org is doing just that [the split] per my suggestion."

Cu
knurd

(¹) Livna considered it also and would have done it in between; but that 
  was not worth the trouble with RPM Fusion on the horizon