New livna packages automatically in rpmfusion ?
by L. Gabriel Somlo
Hi,
I just added a package (xv) to livna, and was wondering if I needed to
do anything proactive to make sure it will be included (probably in
"nonfree, due to its shareware license) once rpmfusion goes live ?
This package is not in freshrpms or dribble, so there are no
collisions there. Just wondering who's court the ball is in w.r.t.
adding recent livna packages to rpmfusion...
Thanks,
Gabriel
17 years
Re: [RPM Fusion] Update of "Wishlist" by MichaelSchoenitzer
by Andrea Musuruane
2007/12/19, RPM Fusion Wiki <noreply(a)rpmfusion.org>:
> Dear Wiki user,
>
> You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "RPM Fusion" for change notification.
>
> The following page has been changed by MichaelSchoenitzer:
> http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist?action=diff&rev1=25&rev2=26
>
> The comment on the change is:
> +2 Packages
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> URL: http://www.asterisk.org/
> Grounds for inclusion: Fedora won't ship the kernel modules (RH #177583).
> Notes: Asterisk (review RH #178922) and Zaptel tools (review RH #177584) are in Fedora.
> +
> + Request: CDemu
> + Summary: a kernel module simulate a CD drive + CD from cue/bin files
> + URL: http://cdemu.sourceforge.net/
> + Grounds for inclusion: Without this there isn't any possibility to mount cue/bin files
> +
> + Request: libtrash
> + Summary: An universal trash can for GNU/Linux
> + URL: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~marriaga/software/libtrash/
> + Grounds for inclusion: Having libtrash installed you won't lose file anymore, while working on the terminal (and in any GUI).
> }}}
>
> '''Maintainers:''' If you decide to work on a package requested here, please label it as "in progress" for example - Request: foo (in progress). Once the package has been published, remove it from this list. Thanks.
>
I'd like to know why these two cannot go directly into Fedora. I'd
like to remember that the "Grounds for inclusion" filed is not used to
specify some sort of motivation for packaging the software but _why
this package is not eligible as a regular Fedora package_.
Thanks.
Bye,
Andrea.
17 years
totem-xine providing totem?
by Richi Plana
Could totem-xine provide totem so that apps needing totem can be
satisfied with having totem-xine? Or should those apps require something
different? Say /usr/bin/totem?
This is actually addressed more to the Livna maintainers where I'm
getting my packages from, but if RPMFusion has decided to adopt
another's package, that's good as well.
--
Richi Plana
17 years
Hi! I need a sponsor
by Mario Chacon
HI!
I will try to help us with excellent idea of RPM FUSION. My first idea
is to add SubDownloder. It's an excellent program to download
subtitles for videos, the home is:
http://code.google.com/p/subdownloader/.
How should i proceed to do it?
Thanks...
Salu2...
17 years
gstreamer mss/mmsh seeking support hitting livna devel repo
by Hans de Goede
Hi All,
I've been spending hours and hours the last week to get mms and mmsh seeking
support added to gstreamer-plugins-bad. This will become available in livna
development as soon as it gets build by the admins.
Note to livna admins: first build the new libmms, then the new
gstreamer-plugins-bad.
In order to enjoy mms seeking (on F-8 or devel), you need to install / update
to the following from Fedora devel:
gstreamer-0.10.15-1
gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.15-1
Note: gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.15-1 will become available with the next
rawhide push, get it from koji now:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24639
And the following from livna devel:
gstreamer-ffmpeg-0.10.2-5
gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.5-12
gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.6-4
I believe I now have this working 100% so please install these, test it and let
me know how it works. When reporting problems please include clear step by step
reproduction instructions.
Regards,
Hans
17 years
Fwd: Re: Matthias Please Please Please fix this
by Eli Wapniarski
> Can't you use the repomd repositories with apt-rpm?
Yes you can, but it is still not possible to prioritize or pin against
repomd using apt-get. And nothing works as well as apt-get with
regarding these two features.
Because of the problem that I mentioned in my previous post, I once
again did a serious investigation of yum and smart over the last
month. I need and want apt-get and in order for it to work properly
you need the apt way of doing things.
Please, please, please don't abandon (from a user perspective anyway)
this elegant, mature, feature rich package manager. It still the best
available.
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
17 years
