February 2008 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 25] New: truecrypt - Free Open-Source Disk Encryption Software

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25 Summary: truecrypt - Free Open-Source Disk Encryption Software Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dominik(a)greysector.net Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/truecrypt.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/truecrypt-5.0a-1.src.rpm Main Features: - Creates a virtual encrypted disk within a file and mounts it as a real disk. - Encrypts an entire hard disk partition or a storage device such as USB flash drive. - Encryption is automatic, real-time (on-the-fly) and transparent. - Provides two levels of plausible deniability, in case an adversary forces you to reveal the password: 1) Hidden volume (steganography). 2) No TrueCrypt volume can be identified (volumes cannot be distinguished from random data). - Encryption algorithms: AES-256, Blowfish (448-bit key), CAST5, Serpent, Triple DES, and Twofish. Mode of operation: LRW (CBC supported as legacy). Why not in Fedora? Problematic licence. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-development-i386/result truecrypt.i386: W: invalid-license Truecrypt License truecrypt-debuginfo.i386: W: invalid-license Truecrypt License truecrypt.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 49, tab: line 1) truecrypt.src: W: invalid-license Truecrypt License -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

3
64
0 / 0

[Bug 19] New: Review request: blcr - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/ Restart for Linux

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19 Summary: Review request: blcr - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: ndbecker2(a)gmail.com Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/blcr.spec https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/blcr-0.6.4-1.src.rpm Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux (BLCR) This package implements system-level checkpointing of scientific applications in a manner suitable for implementing preemption, migration and fault recovery by a batch scheduler. BLCR includes documented interfaces for a cooperating applications or libraries to implement extensions to the checkpoint system, such as consistent checkpointing of distributed MPI applications. Using this package with an appropriate MPI implementation, the vast majority of scientific applications which use MPI for communucation on Linux clusters are checkpointable without any modifications to the application source code. You must also install the %{name}-libs package and a %{name}-modules_* package matching your kernel version. A short description for the package (usually, the %description from the spec file). This is not eligible because it needs a kmod. I have packaged that separately as blcr-kmod using akmods. rpmlint RPM/SRPMS/blcr-0.6.4-1.src.rpm [silence] rpmlint RPM/RPMS/x86_64/blcr-* blcr-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation blcr-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on blcr blcr-libs.x86_64: E: library-not-linked-against-libc /usr/lib64/libcr.so.0.2.1 blcr-libs.x86_64: E: library-not-linked-against-libc /usr/lib/libcr.so.0.2.1 blcr-testsuite.x86_64: W: no-documentation no-doc: Seems trivial no-dependency-on blcr: I think this is correct. blcr is userland utils only. devel depends only on libs because libs has the shared libs that devel needs. Not linked against: This is a problem in upstream. They are aware of it and say it will be fixed in the next version. This is my first rpmfusion pkg. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 9 months

1
34
0 / 0

[Bug 20] New: blcr-kmod - kmod for Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/ Restart for Linux

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20 Summary: blcr-kmod - kmod for Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: ndbecker2(a)gmail.com Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/blcr-kmod.spec https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/blcr-kmod-0.6.4-2.fc8.src.rpm Kernel modules for Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux (BLCR) These kernel modules are built for Linux %{kernel}. You must also install the base %{name} package. Not eligible because of kmod. rpmlint RPM/SRPMS/blcr-kmod-0.6.4-2.fc8.src.rpm [silence] rpmlint RPM/RPMS/x86_64/akmod-blcr-0.6.4-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm akmod-blcr.x86_64: W: no-documentation Seems pretty trivial. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 9 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 26] New: Review request: dvbcut - Clip and convert DVB transport streams to MPEG2 program streams

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26 Summary: Review request: dvbcut - Clip and convert DVB transport streams to MPEG2 program streams Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dtimms(a)iinet.net.au Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut.spec srpm: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut-0.5.4-0.2.20080217svn11... Description: dvbcut is a Qt application that allows you to select certain parts of an MPEG transport stream (as received via Digital Video Broadcasting, DVB) and save these parts into a single MPEG output file. It follows a "keyhole surgery" approach where the input video and audio data is mostly kept unchanged, and only very few frames at the beginning and/or end of the selected range are re-encoded in order to obtain a valid MPEG file. For mpeg video playback dvbcut can use mplayer if available. No can do in Fedora: manipulates mpeg2 transport and program streams, and requires ffmpeg. See also: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-October/msg02398.html rpmlint: is silent for i386|debuginfo|src rpms/ rpmfusion: first timer. 1 package in Fedora: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/glglobe/#dirlist -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 10 months

1
44
0 / 0

[Bug 24] New: Review Request: 96 series NVIDIA driver set ( xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-96xx, nvidia-kmod-96xx)

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24 Summary: Review Request: 96 series NVIDIA driver set (xorg-x11- drv-nvidia-96xx, nvidia-kmod-96xx) Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: s.adam(a)diffingo.com Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/rpmfusion/xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-96xx.spec SRPM: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/rpmfusion/xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-96xx-96.4... SPEC: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/rpmfusion/nvidia-kmod-96xx.spec SRPM: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/rpmfusion/nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.05-2.f... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

16 years, 1 month

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 23] New: Review Request: 71 series NVIDIA driver set ( xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-71xx, nvidia-kmod-71xx)

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23 Summary: Review Request: 71 series NVIDIA driver set (xorg-x11- drv-nvidia-71xx, nvidia-kmod-71xx) Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: s.adam(a)diffingo.com Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/rpmfusion/xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-71xx.spec SRPM: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/rpmfusion/xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-71xx-71.8... SPEC: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/rpmfusion/nvidia-71xx-kmod.spec SRPM: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/rpmfusion/nvidia-71xx-kmod-71.86.04-2.f... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

16 years, 1 month

1
4
0 / 0

FOSDEM discussions

by Matthias Saou

Hi, I'm alive. Yes, I am :-) We've discussed a few things here at the FOSDEM, with Hans (De Goede), Xavier (Lamien) and Remi (Collet). Here's what we've done so far : - Moved the 3rd rpmfusion Xen guest to a more stable server (this is the website and bugzilla server) - Possibly found the stability issue of the current server : The i2o_block module from RHEL5 is less stable than the older dpt_i2o module which was used before (when the server had zero issues), so I've packaged dkms-dpt_i2o for RHEL5 and only need to deploy it onto the server once I'm physically nearby (hopefully next week). Xavier showed us that the FAS was actually up and running, so we'll be checking that, but it might be already finished (in which case, "thanks Thorsten!"). More questions remain to be fully addressed, but we're on the right track to tackle as much as possible, I think. If anyone can think of very important points to discuss ASAP, please reply to the list with them! ;-) Oh, and if any of you are at the FOSDEM, please come say hi! We're around the Fedora booth... Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) - Linux kernel 2.6.23.15-137.fc8 Load : 0.05 0.15 0.08

16 years, 8 months

4
15
0 / 0

[Bug 21] New: kmediafactory - A template based DVD authoring tool

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21 Summary: kmediafactory - A template based DVD authoring tool Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: fedora(a)deadbabylon.de Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/review/kmediafactory/kmediafactory.spec SRPM URL: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/review/kmediafactory/kmediafactory-0.6.0... Description: Kmediafactory is an easy to use template based dvd authoring tool. You can quickly create DVD menus for home videos and TV recordings in three simple steps. Why not in Fedora? This package requires mjpegtools at build time and mplayer, mjpegtools and ffmpeg at runtime to work properly. All mentioned packages are not allowed in Fedora. rpmlint output: kmediafactory.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kmediafactory/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common kmediafactory.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kmediafactory/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common kmediafactory-devel.i386: W: no-documentation The first two are normal for KDE packages. The last one is normal for *-devel packages when no development documentation is included in the package. This is my first package in RPMfusion (but I'm maintaining several packages in Fedora). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

16 years, 8 months

2
3
0 / 0

lbreakout2 moving to Fedora (as lbrickbuster2)

by Hans de Goede

Hi Matthias, I've created a rebranded version of lbreakout2 named lbrickbuster2 (with permission from upstream), this can go into Fedora as the only problem with lbreakout2 was a trademark issue. The review is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435514 I've made it Obsolete lbreakout2, to provide an upgrade path for freshrmps lbreakout2 users. Regards, Hans

16 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review.

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |26 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

16 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers February 2008