May 2008 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 25] New: truecrypt - Free Open-Source Disk Encryption Software

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25 Summary: truecrypt - Free Open-Source Disk Encryption Software Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dominik(a)greysector.net Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/truecrypt.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/truecrypt-5.0a-1.src.rpm Main Features: - Creates a virtual encrypted disk within a file and mounts it as a real disk. - Encrypts an entire hard disk partition or a storage device such as USB flash drive. - Encryption is automatic, real-time (on-the-fly) and transparent. - Provides two levels of plausible deniability, in case an adversary forces you to reveal the password: 1) Hidden volume (steganography). 2) No TrueCrypt volume can be identified (volumes cannot be distinguished from random data). - Encryption algorithms: AES-256, Blowfish (448-bit key), CAST5, Serpent, Triple DES, and Twofish. Mode of operation: LRW (CBC supported as legacy). Why not in Fedora? Problematic licence. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-development-i386/result truecrypt.i386: W: invalid-license Truecrypt License truecrypt-debuginfo.i386: W: invalid-license Truecrypt License truecrypt.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 49, tab: line 1) truecrypt.src: W: invalid-license Truecrypt License -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 2 months

3
64
0 / 0

[Bug 19] New: Review request: blcr - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/ Restart for Linux

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19 Summary: Review request: blcr - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: ndbecker2(a)gmail.com Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/blcr.spec https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/blcr-0.6.4-1.src.rpm Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux (BLCR) This package implements system-level checkpointing of scientific applications in a manner suitable for implementing preemption, migration and fault recovery by a batch scheduler. BLCR includes documented interfaces for a cooperating applications or libraries to implement extensions to the checkpoint system, such as consistent checkpointing of distributed MPI applications. Using this package with an appropriate MPI implementation, the vast majority of scientific applications which use MPI for communucation on Linux clusters are checkpointable without any modifications to the application source code. You must also install the %{name}-libs package and a %{name}-modules_* package matching your kernel version. A short description for the package (usually, the %description from the spec file). This is not eligible because it needs a kmod. I have packaged that separately as blcr-kmod using akmods. rpmlint RPM/SRPMS/blcr-0.6.4-1.src.rpm [silence] rpmlint RPM/RPMS/x86_64/blcr-* blcr-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation blcr-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on blcr blcr-libs.x86_64: E: library-not-linked-against-libc /usr/lib64/libcr.so.0.2.1 blcr-libs.x86_64: E: library-not-linked-against-libc /usr/lib/libcr.so.0.2.1 blcr-testsuite.x86_64: W: no-documentation no-doc: Seems trivial no-dependency-on blcr: I think this is correct. blcr is userland utils only. devel depends only on libs because libs has the shared libs that devel needs. Not linked against: This is a problem in upstream. They are aware of it and say it will be fixed in the next version. This is my first rpmfusion pkg. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 10 months

1
34
0 / 0

[Bug 20] New: blcr-kmod - kmod for Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/ Restart for Linux

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20 Summary: blcr-kmod - kmod for Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: ndbecker2(a)gmail.com Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/blcr-kmod.spec https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/blcr-kmod-0.6.4-2.fc8.src.rpm Kernel modules for Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux (BLCR) These kernel modules are built for Linux %{kernel}. You must also install the base %{name} package. Not eligible because of kmod. rpmlint RPM/SRPMS/blcr-kmod-0.6.4-2.fc8.src.rpm [silence] rpmlint RPM/RPMS/x86_64/akmod-blcr-0.6.4-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm akmod-blcr.x86_64: W: no-documentation Seems pretty trivial. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 10 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 26] New: Review request: dvbcut - Clip and convert DVB transport streams to MPEG2 program streams

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26 Summary: Review request: dvbcut - Clip and convert DVB transport streams to MPEG2 program streams Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dtimms(a)iinet.net.au Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut.spec srpm: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut-0.5.4-0.2.20080217svn11... Description: dvbcut is a Qt application that allows you to select certain parts of an MPEG transport stream (as received via Digital Video Broadcasting, DVB) and save these parts into a single MPEG output file. It follows a "keyhole surgery" approach where the input video and audio data is mostly kept unchanged, and only very few frames at the beginning and/or end of the selected range are re-encoded in order to obtain a valid MPEG file. For mpeg video playback dvbcut can use mplayer if available. No can do in Fedora: manipulates mpeg2 transport and program streams, and requires ffmpeg. See also: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-October/msg02398.html rpmlint: is silent for i386|debuginfo|src rpms/ rpmfusion: first timer. 1 package in Fedora: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/glglobe/#dirlist -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 11 months

1
44
0 / 0

[Bug 24] New: Review Request: 96 series NVIDIA driver set ( xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-96xx, nvidia-kmod-96xx)

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24 Summary: Review Request: 96 series NVIDIA driver set (xorg-x11- drv-nvidia-96xx, nvidia-kmod-96xx) Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: s.adam(a)diffingo.com Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/rpmfusion/xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-96xx.spec SRPM: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/rpmfusion/xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-96xx-96.4... SPEC: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/rpmfusion/nvidia-kmod-96xx.spec SRPM: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/rpmfusion/nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.05-2.f... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

16 years, 2 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 23] New: Review Request: 71 series NVIDIA driver set ( xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-71xx, nvidia-kmod-71xx)

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23 Summary: Review Request: 71 series NVIDIA driver set (xorg-x11- drv-nvidia-71xx, nvidia-kmod-71xx) Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: s.adam(a)diffingo.com Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/rpmfusion/xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-71xx.spec SRPM: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/rpmfusion/xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-71xx-71.8... SPEC: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/rpmfusion/nvidia-71xx-kmod.spec SRPM: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/rpmfusion/nvidia-71xx-kmod-71.86.04-2.f... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

16 years, 2 months

1
4
0 / 0

CVS notification: Dribbles packages branches

by Xavier Lamien

hello folks, i started populate the CVS repository with Dribbles packages. This action will be a bit long. A next message (with more details) will be send once done. Regards, -- Xavier.t Lamien -- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

16 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

sponsor needed

by Dan Horák

Hi, few months ago we spoke that I will become new Kino maintainer after Dominik. The rpmfusion infrastructure is coming near, so I have created an account at rpmfusion's fas and now I am waiting for a sponsor. The account name is "sharkcz", the same as in Fedora. Thanks Dan -- Fedora and Red Hat package maintainer

16 years, 6 months

2
1
0 / 0

Infrastructure status

by Xavier Lamien

Hi folks, There're some tasks to catch, add (?) or also already done. Just browse http://rpmfusion.org/Infrastructure to be up-to-date. Thorsten, i guess you have some tasks to add about buildsys or packages availability ? Hans, if you want import your srpms, you could reach me in IRC this afternoon. Regards, -- Xavier.t Lamien -- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

16 years, 6 months

4
6
0 / 0

Re: rpm confusion? :)

by Andre Robatino

> I already did this. > Check the rpmfusion mailling list archive for that. I've been following the rpmfusion mailing lists for weeks, and except for mention of Dribble being frozen and talk of Rpmfusion going active in a few days, I haven't seen anything explaining what people using Livna/Freshrpms/Dribble will need to do when Rpmfusion goes active (and since Livna and Freshrpms have F9 repos set up already, with mutually incompatible packages as usual, and are acting as if Rpmfusion didn't exist, people do need to know). Even if this is explained somewhere in the mailing list, it would be nice if it was clearly explained right on Rpmfusion.org's home page. P.S. I just got an email from fedora-announce-list stating that Livna repos are now available for F9, and explaining that the plan is to slowly migrate people automatically from Livna to Rpmfusion. Is the same true for Freshrpms and Dribble, so people using any of the 3 repos will get automatically migrated later?

16 years, 7 months

3
2
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers May 2008