[Bug 25] New: truecrypt - Free Open-Source Disk Encryption Software
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
Summary: truecrypt - Free Open-Source Disk Encryption Software
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: dominik(a)greysector.net
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/truecrypt.spec
SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/truecrypt-5.0a-1.src.rpm
Main Features:
- Creates a virtual encrypted disk within a file and mounts it as a
real disk.
- Encrypts an entire hard disk partition or a storage device such as
USB flash drive.
- Encryption is automatic, real-time (on-the-fly) and transparent.
- Provides two levels of plausible deniability, in case an adversary
forces you to reveal the password:
1) Hidden volume (steganography).
2) No TrueCrypt volume can be identified (volumes cannot be
distinguished from random data).
- Encryption algorithms: AES-256, Blowfish (448-bit key), CAST5,
Serpent, Triple DES, and Twofish. Mode of operation: LRW (CBC
supported as legacy).
Why not in Fedora?
Problematic licence.
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-development-i386/result
truecrypt.i386: W: invalid-license Truecrypt License
truecrypt-debuginfo.i386: W: invalid-license Truecrypt License
truecrypt.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 49, tab: line 1)
truecrypt.src: W: invalid-license Truecrypt License
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 2 months
[Bug 19] New: Review request: blcr - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/ Restart for Linux
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19
Summary: Review request: blcr - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart
for Linux
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: ndbecker2(a)gmail.com
Blocks: 2
Estimated Hours: 0.0
https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/blcr.spec
https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/blcr-0.6.4-1.src.rpm
Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux (BLCR)
This package implements system-level checkpointing of scientific applications
in a manner suitable for implementing preemption, migration and fault recovery
by a batch scheduler.
BLCR includes documented interfaces for a cooperating applications or
libraries to implement extensions to the checkpoint system, such as
consistent checkpointing of distributed MPI applications.
Using this package with an appropriate MPI implementation, the vast majority
of scientific applications which use MPI for communucation on Linux clusters
are checkpointable without any modifications to the application source code.
You must also install the %{name}-libs package and a %{name}-modules_* package
matching your kernel version.
A short description for the package (usually, the %description from the spec
file).
This is not eligible because it needs a kmod. I have packaged that separately
as blcr-kmod using akmods.
rpmlint RPM/SRPMS/blcr-0.6.4-1.src.rpm [silence]
rpmlint RPM/RPMS/x86_64/blcr-*
blcr-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
blcr-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on blcr
blcr-libs.x86_64: E: library-not-linked-against-libc /usr/lib64/libcr.so.0.2.1
blcr-libs.x86_64: E: library-not-linked-against-libc /usr/lib/libcr.so.0.2.1
blcr-testsuite.x86_64: W: no-documentation
no-doc: Seems trivial
no-dependency-on blcr: I think this is correct. blcr is userland utils only.
devel depends only on libs because libs has the shared libs that devel needs.
Not linked against: This is a problem in upstream. They are aware of it and
say it will be fixed in the next version.
This is my first rpmfusion pkg.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
15 years, 10 months
[Bug 28] New: Review request: hellanzb - Hands-free nzb downloader and post processor
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28
Summary: Review request: hellanzb - Hands-free nzb downloader and
post processor
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: konrad(a)tylerc.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
URLs:
Spec: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/hellanzb.spec
SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/hellanzb-0.13-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description:
hellanzb is an easy to use application designed to retrieve nzb files
and fully process them. The goal being to make getting files from Usenet
as hands-free as possible. Once fully installed, all that's required
is moving an nzb file to the queue directory. The rest: downloading,
par-checking, un-raring, etc. is done automatically by hellanzb.
This package is not eligible for inclusion in Fedora because it depends upon
the 'unrar' package, which is not available in Fedora.
rpmlint output:
hellanzb.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Hellanzb/Growl.py 0644
hellanzb.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/hellanzb.conf.sample
Growl.py has a shebang line for some unknown reason but is otherwise just a
python library. The conffile is /etc/hellanzb.conf.sample, and thus replaced on
upgrade. The real configuration file is /etc/hellanzb.conf.
This is my first RPM Fusion package; I'm not a new contributor to Fedora.
Thanks!
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
15 years, 10 months
akmod vs. kmod
by Richi Plana
Hi,
I've noticed that in livna, there are two kernel modules available for
nvidia: akmod-nvidia and kmod-nvidia. Are they exclusive of each other
(iow, only one should be installed on a system)? My understanding is
that akmods are compiled whenever any new kernel is installed. Is that
correct? Are there instructions on how to use akmods? (ie. when to
update kernels and when to reboot)
This is a livna-specific question, but I'm assuming that because of the
fusion, these questions can be asked here, and there doesn't seem to be
a "users" list, so ....
--
Richi Plana
16 years, 5 months
Compatibility with Fedora EPEL and other 3d party repositories
by Nikolay Ulyanitsky
Hi
1. Is RPM Fusion fully compatible with Fedora EPEL?
a) Can RPM Fusion packages conflicts with EPEL packages?
b) Can RPM Fusion packages replace (have newer EVR) EPEL packages?
c) If EPEL add existing in RPM Fusion package in his repository, after
this will RPM Fusion remove or rename this package from his repository?
2. Is RPM Fusion fully compatible with other 3d party repositories?
--
Nikolay Ulyanitsky <lystor(a)lystor.org.ua>
16 years, 5 months