July 2008 - rpmfusion-developers

by Matthew Barnes

It seems I'm not on the ACL for the package I own: gnome-video-arcade **** Access denied: mbarnes is not in ACL for rpms/gnome-video-arcade/devel cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first! cvs commit: saving log message in /tmp/cvsfBHxAf Can someone please add me? Also, is there a pkgdb system in place for rpmfusion yet? Thanks, Matthew Barnes

16 years, 4 months

4
4
0 / 0

I had to kill some builds -- out of disk space

by Thorsten Leemhuis

Hi all! Sorry, I had to kill a few builds in plague -- we ran out of diskspace on the server quicker then I thought. I'll try to get some more disk space at hand and will report back later today. CU knurd

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

RPMFusion buildsystem is setting wrongs CFLAGS while building packages at %configure step

by Nicolas Chauvet

Each package that is currently build (either in F-9 F-8 or devel repository) have it CFLAGS set incorrectly at build time In most case, that was caused by the %configure macro to be set incorrectly. I don't know what happen here, but since it still work with the current set of Fedora package while using mock i would say something in the buildsys have been set incorrectly... a52 x86_64 build.Log (section) + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd a52dec-0.7.4 + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -m64 -mtune=generic' + export CFLAGS + CXXFLAGS='-O2 -g -m64 -mtune=generic' + export CXXFLAGS + FFLAGS='-O2 -g -m64 -mtune=generic' + export FFLAGS + ./configure --host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-redhat-linux --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --disable-static checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c a52 ppc64 build.Log (section) + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd a52dec-0.7.4 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mminimal-toc' + export CFLAGS + CXXFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mminimal-toc' + export CXXFLAGS + FFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mminimal-toc' + export FFLAGS ++ find . -name config.guess -o -name config.sub + for i in '$(find . -name config.guess -o -name config.sub)' ++ basename ./autotools/config.guess + '[' -f /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.guess ']' + /bin/rm -f ./autotools/config.guess ++ basename ./autotools/config.guess + /bin/cp -fv /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.guess ./autotools/config.guess `/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.guess' -> `./autotools/config.guess' + for i in '$(find . -name config.guess -o -name config.sub)' ++ basename ./autotools/config.sub + '[' -f /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.sub ']' + /bin/rm -f ./autotools/config.sub ++ basename ./autotools/config.sub + /bin/cp -fv /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.sub ./autotools/config.sub `/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/config.sub' -> `./autotools/config.sub' + ./configure --build=powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu --host=powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu --target=ppc64-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --disable-static checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c

16 years, 4 months

3
3
0 / 0

Buildsys cflags issue solved, now need someone to fix it

by Hans de Goede

Hi, The cflags issue is caused by a subtile but important difference between the plague / mock (dunno where it comes from) configs for i386/x86_64 and ppc/ppc64. For example if you look at: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-8-rpmfusion_nonfree/167-lha-1.1... And then at: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-8-rpmfusion_nonfree/167-lha-1.1... You will see the i386 build fills the buildroot using: "yum install buildsys-build buildsys-macros" Which is wrong as there is no such package / provides as buildsys-build, not buildsys-macros OTOH, ppc correctly uses: "yum groupinstall buildsys-build" Can someone with the necessary rights please fix this? Regards, Hans

16 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

Livna still needs to be maintained until RPM Fusion started

by Thorsten Leemhuis

Hi! There were some discussions in private, so I think it's best to bring this up on the list. I'd like to ask all Livna maintainers to please continue with proper package maintaining in Livna for now until we start to carry users over from Livna to RPM Fusion. That should hopefully happen soon -- two weeks maybe if everything works out well (proper DNS, better filled repos, more space for the mastr-repo on the buildsys and proper release RPMs are the main things that are needed before we start with that). IOW: if you import - a new version of an existing package - a new package which obsoletes other Livna packages to RPM Fusion *please* import and build it for Livna as well for now. Yes, that is a bit of extra work, but that way the RPM Fusion (which has no users yet) packages get indirectly tested in Livna (which has a lot of users and testers); that is IMHO very important and will lead to better packages in RPM Fusion! CU knurd

16 years, 4 months

4
12
0 / 0

Re: rpmfusion sponsorship

by Thorsten Leemhuis

CCing rpmfusion-developers On 23.07.2008 21:14, Lucian Langa wrote: > my name is Lucian Langa, > I'm already a Fedora contributor. > I recently volunteer to maintain some orphaned packages /me looks for details Ahh, http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-July/00059... > and I need sponsor according to FAS. > my account name is lucilanga. Sponsored. Cu knurd

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

CVS won't accept my public key

by David Juran

Hello. I'm trying to add my packages to the rpm-fusion cvs but my public key isn't accepted. Who do I talk to? /David - a.k.a. juran in the rpmfusion FAS

16 years, 4 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review.

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 Bug 2 depends on bug 5, which changed state. Bug 5 Summary: Review Request: linux-uvc - Linux driver for USB Video Class device http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |UPSTREAM -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 5] Review Request: linux-uvc - Linux driver for USB Video Class device

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5 Jarod Wilson <jarod(a)wilsonet.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jarod(a)wilsonet.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Remaining Hours|0.5 |0.0 Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #3 from Jarod Wilson <jarod(a)wilsonet.com> 2008-07-23 02:12:47 --- F8 and F9 also carry uvcvideo via patches, so yeah, there's no need for this package. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 5] Review Request: linux-uvc - Linux driver for USB Video Class device

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5 jeff moe <moe(a)blagblagblag.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |moe(a)blagblagblag.org --- Comment #2 from jeff moe <moe(a)blagblagblag.org> 2008-07-23 01:54:58 --- Vanilla linux 2.6.26 now includes UVC so this may be unnecessary unless you want it for old releases. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

16 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers July 2008