September 2008 - rpmfusion-developers

RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2008-09-23

by rpmfusion-pkgs-report＠rpmfusion.org

============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: 3 (!) audacity-freeworld-1.3.5-0.4.beta.fc9 : INVALID rebuild, not published! NEW gcube-0.4-5.fc9 : Nintendo Gamecube emulator vlc-0.8.7-0.4.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/8: 3 (!) audacity-freeworld-1.3.5-0.4.beta.fc8 : INVALID rebuild, not published! NEW gcube-0.4-5.fc8 : Nintendo Gamecube emulator vlc-0.8.7-0.4.fc8 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 2 (!) audacity-freeworld-1.3.5-0.4.beta.fc10 : INVALID rebuild, not published! NEW gcube-0.4-5.fc10 : Nintendo Gamecube emulator ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: audacity-freeworld-1.3.5-0.4.beta.fc9 ------------------------------------- * Sat Aug 23 2008 David Timms <iinet.net.au@dtimms> - 1.3.5-0.4.beta - mod patch2 apply command gcube-0.4-5.fc9 --------------- * Tue Sep 23 2008 David Timms <iinet.net.au@dtimms> 0.4-5 - add ExcludeArch: ppc64 since lack of asm bswap stops build * Mon Sep 22 2008 David Timms <iinet.net.au@dtimms> 0.4-4 - initial import into rpmfusion and release bump - set license tag to match updated fedora guideline vlc-0.8.7-0.4.fc9 ----------------- * Wed Sep 24 2008 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.8.7-0.4 - libaccess_gnomevfs_plugin is no more in -core - More HEAD bugfixes (live555) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/8: audacity-freeworld-1.3.5-0.4.beta.fc8 ------------------------------------- * Sat Aug 23 2008 David Timms <iinet.net.au@dtimms> - 1.3.5-0.4.beta - mod patch2 apply command gcube-0.4-5.fc8 --------------- * Tue Sep 23 2008 David Timms <iinet.net.au@dtimms> 0.4-5 - add ExcludeArch: ppc64 since lack of asm bswap stops build * Mon Sep 22 2008 David Timms <iinet.net.au@dtimms> 0.4-4 - initial import into rpmfusion and release bump - set license tag to match updated fedora guideline vlc-0.8.7-0.4.fc8 ----------------- * Wed Sep 24 2008 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.8.7-0.4 - libaccess is no more in -core - More HEAD bugfixes (live555) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: audacity-freeworld-1.3.5-0.4.beta.fc10 -------------------------------------- * Sat Aug 23 2008 David Timms <iinet.net.au@dtimms> - 1.3.5-0.4.beta - mod patch2 apply command gcube-0.4-5.fc10 ---------------- * Tue Sep 23 2008 David Timms <iinet.net.au@dtimms> 0.4-5 - add ExcludeArch: ppc64 since lack of asm bswap stops build * Mon Sep 22 2008 David Timms <iinet.net.au@dtimms> 0.4-4 - initial import into rpmfusion and release bump - set license tag to match updated fedora guideline

15 years, 7 months

2
1
0 / 0

RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2008-09-23

by rpmfusion-pkgs-report＠rpmfusion.org

============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: 1 NEW mednafen-0.8.9-1.fc9 : A multi-system emulator utilizing OpenGL and SDL ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/8: 1 NEW mednafen-0.8.9-1.fc8 : A multi-system emulator utilizing OpenGL and SDL ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 1 NEW mednafen-0.8.9-1.fc10 : A multi-system emulator utilizing OpenGL and SDL ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: mednafen-0.8.9-1.fc9 -------------------- * Sun Sep 21 2008 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0.8.9-1 - Updated to 0.8.9 - Dropped the rpath patch, does not seem to be necessary ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/8: mednafen-0.8.9-1.fc8 -------------------- * Sun Sep 21 2008 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0.8.9-1 - Updated to 0.8.9 - Dropped the rpath patch, does not seem to be necessary ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: mednafen-0.8.9-1.fc10 --------------------- * Sun Sep 21 2008 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0.8.9-1 - Updated to 0.8.9 - Dropped the rpath patch, does not seem to be necessary

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

successfully built - awaiting sign v available rpms

by Agnes Jones

Hi, I'm not sure if there is a further step I need to do after successfully building a package before it gets into: http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/i386/os/ for example. This is regarding gcube whose builds recently succeeded. What is the procedure, or does a set time passing needed to make it happen ? DaveT.

15 years, 7 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review.

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |43 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

quite a few packages are still missing in the repos :-(

by Thorsten Leemhuis

Hi all! I just did a rough check which packages are branched in CVS, but afaics not yet build for either F-8, F-9 or devel; see below for a full list (scroll down for a list of packages sorted by email of its owner). If one of your packages is in this list please take care of it or tell me what's wrong. tia! = free repo = == packages == akode-extras audacious-plugins-freeworld avidemux comical DVDAuthorWizard DVDRipOMatic dvd-slideshow dvdstyler gcube gltron gsview k3b-extras-freeworld k9copy kdemultimedia-extras-freeworld kmediafactory KmPg2 kplayer libdlna libmss libtunepimp-extras-freeworld lxdream madplay mamory mupen64 nes-ntsc Nestopia pangzero qmmp-plugins-freeworld rpmfusion-release smpeg snes-ntsc streamdvd ushare-freeworld yabause == packages with owners == andreas at bawue.net comical chris.stone at gmail.com gltron dtimms at iinet.net.au gcube dtimms at iinet.net.au madplay eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr libdlna eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr ushare-freeworld fedora at deadbabylon.de kmediafactory j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl DVDAuthorWizard j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl DVDRipOMatic j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl dvd-slideshow j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl nes-ntsc j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl KmPg2 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl lxdream j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl mamory j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl mupen64 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl pangzero j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl snes-ntsc j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl yabause kvolny at redhat.com qmmp-plugins-freeworld kwizart at gmail.com smpeg libmss -- no owner known lxtnow at gmail.com rpmfusion-release lxtnow at gmail.com streamdvd musuruan at gmail.com Nestopia ralf at skytale.net audacious-plugins-freeworld rdieter at math.unl.edu akode-extras rdieter at math.unl.edu gsview rdieter at math.unl.edu k3b-extras-freeworld rdieter at math.unl.edu k9copy rdieter at math.unl.edu kdemultimedia-extras-freeworld rdieter at math.unl.edu kplayer rdieter at math.unl.edu libtunepimp-extras-freeworld s.adam at diffingo.com avidemux s.adam at diffingo.com dvdstyler = nonfree repo = == packages == doc e-uae libcapsimage mednafen mupen64-ricevideo raine sidplay-libs sl uade winki == packages with owners == j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl doc j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl libcapsimage j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl mednafen j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl mupen64-ricevideo j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl raine j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl sidplay-libs j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl sl j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl uade musuruan at gmail.com e-uae winki-- no owner known = footnotes = * The usual warning for such script-created lists applies of course: there might be some false positives in this list. I for example know that j.w.r.degoede owns a lot of packages, but he normally takes care of them quite well, so I'm wondering why he shows in above lists that often * I'll take a closer look at each of the above packages over the next few days and poke maintainers directly to get RPM Fusion in shape (help appreciated); do me a favor and save me some work by fixing your packages; or consider to mail the list and explain whats up; tia! == EOF == CU knurd

15 years, 7 months

13
36
0 / 0

[Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review.

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|16 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 16] Review request: gpac - MPEG-4 multimedia framework

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16 NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 | Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #3 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2008-09-23 15:01:52 --- This bug has been reviewed and was imported successfully : was http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1204 closing the rpmfusion review request -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review.

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |48 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

SELinux and execheap

by Andrea Musuruane

Hi all, As you main know, I maintain e-uae in RPM Fusion. Unluckily it requires an executable heap and SELinux complains about this. Therefore I try to tell SELinux that this program is OK to require an executable heap and not to worry about. I read that changing the context of the executable to unconfined_execmem_exec_t should be enough. This is the scriptlet I tried to make, but it doesn't work. %post [...] semanage fcontext -a -t unconfined_execmem_exec_t %{_bindir}/uae >/dev/null 2>&1 || : restorecon -R %{_bindir}/uae %postun [...] if [ "$1" -eq "0" ]; then semanage fcontext -d -t unconfined_execmem_exec_t %{_bindir}/uae >/dev/null 2>&1 || : fi Any idea what is wrong? A link to proper documentation should be helpful too. I Googled a lot without finding anything really useful :( Thanks. Bye, Andrea.

15 years, 7 months

3
6
0 / 0

Re: [Fwd: Re: Legality questions.... (<repositoryWhichShallNotBeNamed> & nVidia)]

by Thorsten Leemhuis

CCing rpmfusion-developers, where more contributors watch On 20.09.2008 08:14, Matěj Cepl wrote: > let me continue the below discussion from the internal Red Hat list here. > > Did anybody think about the issue mentioned below? Meaning that if > there is only domain rpmfusion.org, employees of Red Hat may be as > barred from talking about it from fear of possible contributory > infringment as they are now forbidden to talk about > <repositoryWhichShallNotBeNamed>. The plan was/still is to not offer the repos as download1.rpmfusion.org/{non,}free/ but also offer them as {non,}free.rpmfusion.org with a small Frontpage for each of them that mentions the most important things and points people to rpmfusion.org for more informations. But I don't consider this domain name split one of the most important things, that's why I haven't worked on this. Anyway: Do you think that's split with subdomains is "good enough"? > I am not a lawyer anymore and I am not 100% sure about the legal > implications of having separate domain names (and no I haven't asked RH > legal), but did anybody think whether the current development of > rpmfusion means, that I still won't be able to talk about nvidia > binary-only drivers (for example)? (and I am from xorg team in RH, so I > hate nvidia drivers as a matter of principle, but it is obvious that > some of our users when they have to pick between non-functional nv > driver and binary-only nvidia, pick the latter one). Just a crazy idea: If mentioning RPM Fusion really is or becomes a problem why not create a completely new project somewhere with a totally separate domain name that does nothing else then providing the fglrx and nvidia driver packages from RPM Fusion in their repos? It should not be much more work then programming and maintaining a small script that mirrors just those drivers and created new repodata for each dir they are found in. Cu knurd > -------- Přeposlaná zpráva -------- >> Předmět: Re: Legality questions.... (<domanWhichShallNotBeNamed> & >> nVidia) >> Datum: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:26:28 +0530 >> >> Matěj Cepl wrote: >>> Rahul Sundaram píše v So 30. 08. 2008 v 07:53 +0530: >>>>> Alexander Oliva suggested to split <domanWhichShallNotBeNamed> >> into two independent >>>>> repositories -- one (using Debian terminology) non-free and other >> non-us >>>>> I don't know if anything came out of this idea. Although, I am >> afraid, >>>>> even European Red Hat employess wouldn't be allowed to talk about >> non-us >>>>> repository. >>>> Rpmfusion.org is doing just that per my suggestion. They have two >>>> repositories. free vs non-free. >>> Except that if this will be one server, we won't be able to talk >> about >>> it anyway, because mentioning rpmfusion.org could be equivalent to >>> mentioning rpm.<domanWhichShallNotBeNamed>.org (even though we would >> really like to point to >>> free patent-free software not in Fedora repositories). Or there will >> be >>> two domains? >> I am not sure they are planning on two domains. Feel free to talk to >> them about it assuming you are sure of the legal implications. >

15 years, 7 months

2
2
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers September 2008