January 2011 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 30] New: Tracker : Sponsorship Request

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Summary: Tracker : Sponsorship Request Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: lxtnow(a)gmail.com CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 This is a tracker bug for sponsorship requests in RPM Fusion. All new RPM Fusion contributors who need to be sponsored should block this bug. SPONSORS: When you accept the responsibility of sponsoring, please take it off of this list. Note: All members who already contribute to the Fedora Project (Packaging Side) no need to request for sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years

1
87
0 / 0

[Bug 351] New: Review request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351 Summary: Review request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dtimms(a)iinet.net.au CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requiremen... SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requiremen... Description: Use this package to install the packages required to run vmware locally. This package does not include the free vmware-server or vmware-server-console package itself. They can be obtained from the vmware website. Can't be in Fedora: - it's a meta package - it enables use of non fedora software - the proper packaging should really be done by the upstream author. - the upstream is not open source - the upstream do not support the fedora distribution - FESCO discussed it recently, and voted that helper packages for third party apps shall be blocked from Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007#c17 The original Fedora review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 FESCO item tracking: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/35 FESCO discussion should show up soon for 2009-01-30: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/fesco/ ===== rpmlint: vmware-requirements.src:34: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/security/pam_unix.so vmware-requirements.src:51: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 vmware-requirements.src:53: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 vmware-requirements.src:55: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXtst.so.6 vmware-requirements.src:57: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 vmware-requirements.i386: W: no-documentation vmware-requirements.i386: E: no-binary vmware-requirements-server.i386: W: no-documentation vmware-requirements-server.i386: E: devel-dependency kernel-devel 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 2 warnings. ===== So, do we want to allow helper packages like this in RPM Fusion ? Note it does not Require: any packages external to Fedora/RPM Fusion, nor does it attempt to download them. Others have mentioned that other external no source apps might include skype etc, that could receive similar RPM Fusion packaging assistance ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 1032] New: Review request: idjc - Internet DJ Console

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1032 Summary: Review request: idjc - Internet DJ Console Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jsteffan(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/idjc.spec SRPM: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/idjc-0.8.1-2.fc12.src.rpm Internet DJ console is a free software application for people wanting to make radio shows on the internet. [...] Needs rpmfusion due to BRs. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-12-x86_64/result/*.rpm rpmbuild/SPECS/idjc.spec 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 2 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 584] New: Review Request: squish - Squish DXT compression library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=584 Summary: Review Request: squish - Squish DXT compression library Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/squish/squish-1.10-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/squish/squish.spec Summary: Squish DXT compression library The package was refused on Fedora according that DXT is patented: http://www.patentlens.net/patentlens/patsearch.cgi?patnum=US+5956431#show https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=407561 This package is elligible for rpmfusion-free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 2 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1319] New: Review request:BLCR - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1319 Summary: Review request:BLCR - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: https://ftg.lbl.gov/CheckpointRestart/CheckpointRestart. shtml OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: nguyenkims(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 * URLS to spec file and source rpm of BLCR package: http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=de0138956b52366aab1eab3e9fa335ca4bbcee... * Description: Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux (BLCR) This package implements system-level checkpointing of scientific applications in a manner suitable for implementing preemption, migration and fault recovery by a batch scheduler. BLCR includes documented interfaces for a cooperating applications or libraries to implement extensions to the checkpoint system, such as consistent checkpointing of distributed MPI applications. Using this package with an appropriate MPI implementation, the vast majority of scientific applications which use MPI for communication on Linux clusters are checkpointable without any modifications to the application source code. * Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: This package contains BLCR kernel module so it can not be included in Fedora. * The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. - BLCR-kmod source package: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - BLCR source package: blcr.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US checkpointing -> check pointing, check-pointing, checkpoint blcr.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US checkpointable -> checkpoint able, checkpoint-able, checkpoint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. The first two messages are just spelling problems. - kmod-blcr binary package kmod-blcr-2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686.i686: W: summary-not-capitalized C blcr kernel module(s) for 2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686 kmod-blcr-2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686/extra/blcr/blcr_imports.ko kmod-blcr-2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686/extra/blcr/blcr.ko kmod-blcr-2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686.i686: W: no-documentation kmod-blcr-2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686.i686: E: kernel-modules-not-in-kernel-packages /lib/modules/2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686/extra/blcr kmod-blcr-2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686.i686: E: kernel-modules-not-in-kernel-packages /lib/modules/2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686/extra/blcr/blcr_imports.ko kmod-blcr-2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686.i686: E: kernel-modules-not-in-kernel-packages /lib/modules/2.6.32.14-127.fc12.i686/extra/blcr/blcr.ko 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 4 warnings. The 1st message: I think this is a bug of rpmlint The 2nd & 3rd message: I don't know how to correct it ( but I don't think it is serious) The 4th message: There's no documentation for this module package The 5th-7th errors: Due to fedora politics about modules. - BLCR binary package blcr.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US checkpointing -> check pointing, check-pointing, checkpoint blcr.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US checkpointable -> checkpoint able, checkpoint-able, checkpoint blcr.i686: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/blcr 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. The first 2 messages: Spelling problems The 3rd: I suppose that is due to the fact that BLCR is already installed on my machine. * It's my first RPM fusion package * Also, I'm seeking for a sponsor :) (I'm not sponsored packager in fedora) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 2 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 472] New: Review request: dynamips - IOS Emulator/Hypervisor

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472 Summary: Review request: dynamips - IOS Emulator/Hypervisor Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: cooly(a)gnome.eu.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SRPM: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips-0.2.7-5.fc10.x86_64.rpm SPEC: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips.spec Description: Dynamips is an IOS emulator with hypervisor, allowing users to run several IOS images (in particular 3600 and 7200 series) as fully functional routers Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: This is an emulator and requires IOS images. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 2 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 718] New: Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=718 Summary: Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: andrew(a)topdog.za.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/gns3/gns3.spec SRPM URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/gns3/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.sr... Description: Graphical network simulator that allows you to design complex network topologies. You may run simulations or configure devices ranging from simple workstations to powerful Cisco routers. It uses Dynamips, an IOS emulator and PEMU, a PIX emulator which allow users to run IOS and PIX binary images from Cisco Systems. * rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.i586.rpm gns3.i586: E: no-binary 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. - ignoring the error because this is written in python so does not contain any binary. * rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/gns3.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This is my first rpmfusion package but i am a fedora package maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 2 months

1
7
0 / 0

jobs failing on rawhide due to xvidcore?

by Alex Lancaster

It appears that jobs are failing on rawhide due to the xvidcore package: Installed size: 534 M http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/plague-results/fedora-development-rpmfusion...: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 : http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/plague-results/fedora-development-rpmfusion... Trying other mirror. Error Downloading Packages: xvidcore-1.2.2-1.fc15.x86_64: failure: xvidcore/1.2.2-1.fc15/x86_64/xvidcore-1.2.2-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm from rpmfusion-free-needsign-rawhide: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Full log here: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/8830... I also checked some other packages, and they also appear to be failing for the same reason, e.g.: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=8829

13 years

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 171] New: Review Request: rpmfusion-config-display - tool to manage proprietary graphic drivers

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171 Summary: Review Request: rpmfusion-config-display - tool to manage proprietary graphic drivers Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: s.adam(a)diffingo.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 75 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion-config-display/rpmfusion-config-d... SRPM: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion-config-display/rpmfusion-config-d... Description: rpmfusion-config-display is a graphical and command-line tool to manage the various display drivers offered at the RPM Fusion repository. It configures the X server configuration dynamically, allowing for autoselection of an appropriate driver based on the installed hardware or manual override by the user. rpmlint output: rpmfusion-config-display.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/rpmfusion-config-display rpmfusion-config-display.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/rpmfusion-config-display rpmfusion-config-display.noarch: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/rpmfusion-config-display These can be ignored since the we don't need a subsys, and the service should be enabled by default. Upgrade plan: Once rpmfusion-config-display has been implemented, it will obsolete livna-config-display and allow for the parallel installation of multiple drivers as well. The README.developers file contains information how to create the a driver config file which enables rpmfusion-config-display to configure the user's system for that driver. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
61
0 / 0

[Bug 1539] New: Review request: pithos - A Pandora client for the GNOME Desktop

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1539 Summary: Review request: pithos - A Pandora client for the GNOME Desktop Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: silas(a)sewell.ch CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: https://github.com/silas/rpms/raw/master/pithos/pithos.spec SRPM: https://github.com/downloads/silas/rpms/pithos-0.3.6-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Pithos is a Pandora client for the GNOME Desktop. The official Flash-based client is a CPU hog, and Pianobar is a great reverse-engineered implementation, but is command-line only. Neither integrate with the desktop very well, missing things like media key support and song notifications. Why Not Fedora: Requires gstreamer-plugins-bad. Rpmlint: pithos.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pithos - Desktop application pithos.src:9: W: macro-in-comment %{version} pithos.src:10: W: macro-in-comment %{version} pithos.src:10: W: macro-in-comment %{version} - This is fine pithos.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install pithos.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean pithos.src: W: no-buildroot-tag pithos.src: W: no-%clean-section - Legacy warnings pithos.src: W: invalid-url Source0: pithos-0.3.6.tar.gz - No archive download I could find, checked out using bzr (see comment) First RPM Fusion package? - Yes -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
10
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers January 2011