[Bug 2151] New: Review request: perle-serial-kmod - Perle Serial PCI card kernel module(s)
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2151
Bug #: 2151
Summary: Review request: perle-serial-kmod - Perle Serial PCI
card kernel module(s)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: philipp(a)redfish-solutions.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Perle Systems makes several PCI and PCIe serial cards, but there support for
linux 2.6 and 3.x is lacking.
This package patches their driver tarball and builds it as per rpmfusion as
kmod.
ftp://ftp.redfish-solutions.com/pub/perle-serial-kmod.spec
ftp://ftp.redfish-solutions.com/pub/perle-serial-kmod-3.8.0-6.1.fc16.1.sr...
== description ==
This package provides a driver for the family of Perle serial cards.
The cards supported are:
Perle UltraPort1, 2, 4, 8, 8i, and 16 cards
Perle UltraPort1, 2, 4, 8, 8i, and 16 SI cards
Perle UltraPort1, 2, 4, 8, and 8i Express cards
Perle PCI-RAS V.92 (4 and 8 port) cards
Perle Speed1, 2, 4, and 8 LE cards
Read /usr/share/doc/perle-serial/README for more info.
====
This is a kmod package, and as such can't be included in Fedora.
====
$ rpmlint perle-serial-kmod.spec
perle-serial-kmod.spec:44: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 44,
tab: line 6)
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$
The spaces come as a result of cut&paste of taking the description directly
from upstream files.
$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/*perle-serial*
kmod-perle-serial-3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C
perle-serial kernel module(s) for 3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64
kmod-perle-serial-3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/lib/modules/3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64/extra/perle-serial/perle-serial.ko
kmod-perle-serial-3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64.x86_64: W: no-documentation
kmod-perle-serial.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta
package, Meta-package, Prepackage
kmod-perle-serial.x86_64: W: no-documentation
perle-serial-kmod-common.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) userland ->
user land, user-land, slanderous
perle-serial-kmod-common.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
Userland -> User land, User-land, Slanderous
perle-serial-kmod-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/perle-serial-kmod-3.8.0/_kmod_build_3.1.9-1.fc16.x86_64/perle-serial.c
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings.
$
"Userland" and "Metapackage" are legitimate words in this lexicon.
The wrong FSF address in perle-serial.c is directly from the upstream sources.
Kernel modules are unstripped (or they wouldn't load otherwise).
The not capitalized warning applies to a string that's generated from a macro.
The documentation is in the -common package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
4 years, 1 month
[Bug 2221] New: Review request: libarea - Library that allows for creating tool paths for pocketing
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2221
Bug #: 2221
Summary: Review request: libarea - Library that allows for
creating tool paths for pocketing
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: SpikeFedora(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL:
http://spike.fedorapeople.org/libarea/libarea.spec
SRPM URL:
http://spike.fedorapeople.org/libarea/libarea-0.0.2-0.1.20111215git599996...
Description:
LibAREA is a library that allows for creating tool paths for pocketing.
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora:
"Some software is not functional or useful without the presence of external
code dependencies in the runtime operating system environment. When those
external code dependencies are non-free, legally unacceptable, or binary-only
[...], then the dependent software is not acceptable for inclusion in
Fedora"[1]
Since atm only HeeksCNC uses this lib and HeeksCNC depends on OCE
(HeeksCNC->HeeksCAD-devel->OCE-devel), which is considered non-free, I assume
the term "not useful" applies here.
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
rpmlint output:
SPECS/libarea.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: libarea-svnHEAD.tar.bz2
libarea.src: W: invalid-url Source0: libarea-svnHEAD.tar.bz2
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Upstream doesn't provide a release package tarball.
Careful: I usually don't do any python packaging. Here be dragons!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
4 years, 1 month
[Bug 2222] New: Review request: libactp - Adaptive Clearing Tool Path Library
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2222
Bug #: 2222
Summary: Review request: libactp - Adaptive Clearing Tool Path
Library
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: SpikeFedora(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Spec URL:
http://spike.fedorapeople.org/libactp/libactp.spec
SRPM URL:
http://spike.fedorapeople.org/libactp/libactp-0.0.2-0.1.20111219giteb97a6...
Description:
The libactp (Adaptive Clearing Tool Path Library) is an implementation of the
GPL'ed algorithm demonstrated in FreeSteel as a set of C library functions
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora:
"Some software is not functional or useful without the presence of external
code dependencies in the runtime operating system environment. When those
external code dependencies are non-free, legally unacceptable, or binary-only
[...], then the dependent software is not acceptable for inclusion in
Fedora"[1]
Since atm only HeeksCNC uses this lib and HeeksCNC depends on OCE
(HeeksCNC->HeeksCAD-devel->OCE-devel), which is considered non-free, I assume
the term "not useful" applies here.
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
rpmlint output:
SPECS/libactp.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: libactp-svnHEAD.tar.bz2
libactp.src: W: invalid-url Source0: libactp-svnHEAD.tar.bz2
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Upstream doesn't provide a release package tarball.
Careful: I usually don't do any python packaging. Here be dragons!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6 years, 10 months
[Bug 2363] New: jitsi - Open Source Video Calls and Chat
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2363
Bug #: 2363
Summary: jitsi - Open Source Video Calls and Chat
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: fedora(a)marionline.it
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC: http://marionline.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/jitsi.spec
SRPMS:
http://marionline.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/jitsi-1.1-1.nightly.bui...
Description:
Jitsi (previously SIP Communicator) is an audio/video and chat communicator
that supports protocols such as SIP, XMPP/Jabber, AIM/ICQ, Windows Live, Yahoo!
and many other useful features.
Why here:
This package cannot be shipped into official fedora repository because upstream
use ffmpeg library.
Rpmlint:
jitsi.src: W: invalid-url Source4: portaudio-hotplug-r1838.tar.gz
jitsi.src: W: invalid-url Source3: jdic-r1736.tar.gz
jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/libportaudio.a
jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/portaudio.h
jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/pkgconfig/portaudio-2.0.pc
jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/pa_linux_alsa.h
jitsi.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jitsi
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.
I think jdic and portaudio branch hotplug for now is useful just for jitsi so I
include them directly in this package. There are not official releases of this
two packages, I checkout the code from svn repository.
This is not my first RPM package. I just open another review request here for
another SIP software, homer:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2237
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6 years, 10 months
[Bug 2421] New: booh - Static web-album generator
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2421
Bug #: 2421
Summary: booh - Static web-album generator
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: casper.le.fantom(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/booh.spec
SRPM URL: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/booh-0.9.3-1.fc17.src.rpm
Description:
Yet another Web-Album generator. Highlights:
* automatic rotation of portrait images thanks to information
put by digital camera in .jpg file (EXIF)
* immediate display of images (preloading in browser)
* keep position of "next/previous" hyperlinks in browser
between images
* full video support (including thumbnailing)
* clever use of the whole space of a typical browser window
(the need to scroll portrait images is stupid)
* themability
* sub-albums support
* remember your preferred size of thumbnails accross sub-albums
* multi-processor support to speed up thumbnails generation
* smooth integration of panoramic images in thumbnails pages
* multi-languages web-album navigation (navigation links are
automatically shown in user's language)
* a GUI to input captions, rotate, reorder and remove
images FAST (extensive use of keyboard shortcuts)
* another GUI to classify photos and videos in a powerful manner
Hello, this a new package for rpmfusion-free repository
Have a nice day
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 3 months
[Bug 2483] New: Review request: msttcore-fonts - TrueType core fonts for the web
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2483
Bug #: 2483
Summary: Review request: msttcore-fonts - TrueType core fonts
for the web
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: janes.rob(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
spec file:
https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/mscorefonts2/specs/msttcore-fon...
Source rpm:
no source rpm. there is no source, the microsoft eula doesn't allow
distribution of the fonts with the rpm.
rpm:
https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/mscorefonts2/rpms/msttcore-font...
========================================================================
Description:
This provides the TrueType core fonts for the web that were once
available from http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fontpack/ prior
to 2002, and most recently updated in the European Union Expansion
Update circa May 2007, still available on the Microsoft website.
With this rpm the actual font cab files are downloaded from a
Sourceforge project mirror and unpacked at install time. Therefore
this package technically does not 'redistribute' the fonts. The
fonts are then added to the core X fonts system as well as the Xft
font system.
These are the cab files downloaded:
andale32.exe, arialb32.exe, comic32.exe, courie32.exe,
georgi32.exe, impact32.exe, webdin32.exe, EUupdate.EXE,
wd97vwr32.exe
These cab files are only downloaded if EUupdate.EXE cannot be
downloaded, since the EUupdate.EXE cab contains updates for
the fonts in these cabs:
arial32.exe, times32.exe, trebuc32.exe, verdan32.exe
These are the fonts added:
1998 Andale Mono
2006 Arial: bold, bold italic, italic, regular
1998 Arial: black
1998 Comic: bold, regular
2000 Courier: bold, bold italic, italic, regular
1998 Impact
2006 Times: bold, bold italic, italic, regular
2006 Trebuchet: bold, bold italic, italic, regular
2006 Verdana: bold, bold italic, italic, regular
1998 Webdings
========================================================================
Fedora eligibility:
I haven't tried, but I assume licensing restrictions on the fonts would be an
issue, although the fonts are not a part of the rpm.
========================================================================
rpmlint:
========================================================================
This is my first rpmfusion package
========================================================================
I am seeking a sponsor.
[ I think that's what I'm supposed to do ]
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 3 months
[Bug 2384] New: Review request: vlcj - Java framework for the vlc media player
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2384
Bug #: 2384
Summary: Review request: vlcj - Java framework for the vlc
media player
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mefoster(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Created attachment 914
--> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=914
build.log from local mock build
Spec file: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/vlcj.spec
SRPM: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/vlcj-2.1.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
Description:
The vlcj project is an Open Source project that provides Java bindings for
the excellent vlc media player from VideoLAN. The bindings can be used to
build media player client and server software using Java - everything from
simply playing local media files to a full-blown video-on-demand streaming
server is possible.
Not eligible for Fedora because: it depends on vlc, which is in rpmfusion
rather than Fedora
% rpmlint vlcj-2.1.0-1.fc17.src.rpm noarch/vlcj-2.1.0-1.fc17.noarch.rpm
noarch/vlcj-javadoc-2.1.0-1.fc17.noarch.rpm
vlcj.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) vlc -> vac, VLF
vlcj.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vlc -> vac, VLF
vlcj.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) vlc -> vac, VLF
vlcj.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vlc -> vac, VLF
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
==> Ignored because vlc is the correct name of the package
This is my first rpmfusion package, but I maintain several packages (mainly
Java packages) in Fedora and am active in the Fedora Java SIG.
Note that this package requires a patch to be applied to the "jna" library in
Fedora as described here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833786
I will attach a mock build.log from building this package in mock on my local
machine against a patched version of jna.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 3 months
[Bug 2190] New: Review request: AtomicParsley - Command-Line Program to Read and Set iTunes-style Metadata Tags
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2190
Bug #: 2190
Summary: Review request: AtomicParsley - Command-Line Program
to Read and Set iTunes-style Metadata Tags
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: avi(a)unix.sh
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2, 30
RPM, SPEC and SRPM: http://avi.alkalay.net/software/atomicparsley/
AtomicParsley is a lightweight command line program that can read and set
iTunes-style metadata tags in MPEG-4 files & 3gp assets in 3GPP/3GPP2 files.
Maybe this package IS eligible to plain Fedora, please tell me. It doesn't have
any special dependencies on non-plain-Fedora packages. Altought it manages
proprietary MPEG-4 files, this software apparently does that through direct
binary file manipulation.
$ rpmlint SRPMS/AtomicParsley-0.9.0-7.fc16.src.rpm
RPMS/x86_64/AtomicParsley-0.9.0-7.fc16.x86_64.rpm
AtomicParsley.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary AtomicParsley
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
This is not my first package submission but previous packages never were
approved mostly due to lack of sponsors.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 3 months
